Demographics details for Clarks hill, SC vs Eufaula, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarks hill, SC vs Eufaula, OK.
Data | Clarks hill | Eufaula |
---|---|---|
Population | 78 | 2,805 |
Median Age | 68.4 years | 47.7 years |
Median Income | $26,500 | $38,774 |
Married Families | 19.0% | 26.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Clarks hill vs Eufaula
- The population in Eufaula is higher at 2,805, compared to 78 in Clarks hill.
- Residents in Clarks hill have a higher median age of 68.4 years compared to 47.7 years in Eufaula.
- Eufaula has a higher median income of $38,774, compared to $26,500 in Clarks hill.
- In Eufaula, the percentage of married families is higher at 26.0%, compared to 19.0% in Clarks hill.
- The poverty level is higher in Eufaula at 15%, compared to 0% in Clarks hill.
- The unemployment rate in Clarks hill is higher at 5.5%, compared to 3.2% in Eufaula.
Demographics
Demographics Clarks hill vs Eufaula provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Clarks hill | Eufaula |
---|---|---|
Black | 79 | 5 |
White | 21 | 70 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 13 |
Demographics Comparison: Clarks hill vs Eufaula
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clarks hill at 79% compared to 5% in Eufaula.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Eufaula at 70% compared to 21% in Clarks hill.
- In Eufaula, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Clarks hill.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Clarks hill and Eufaula at 0%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Eufaula at 11%, compared to 0% in Clarks hill.
- In Eufaula, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 13%, compared to 0% in Clarks hill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Clarks hill | Eufaula |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 21.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 16.1% |
Depression | 18.3% | 26.7% |
Smoking | 21.7% | 26.9% |
Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 13.1% |
Obesity | 40.4% | 45.3% |
Disability Percentage | 42.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarks hill vs Eufaula
- In Eufaula, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.4% compared to 18.6% in Clarks hill.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Eufaula at 26.7% versus 18.3% in Clarks hill.
- Eufaula has a higher smoking rate at 26.9% compared to 21.7% in Clarks hill.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clarks hill at 14.1% compared to 13.1% in Eufaula.
- Eufaula has higher obesity rates at 45.3% compared to 40.4% in Clarks hill.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clarks hill at 42.0% compared to 24.0% in Eufaula.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Clarks hill | Eufaula |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (1) |
High School Diploma | 20.5% (16) | 21.7% (608) |
Less than High School | 32.1% (25) | 22.1% (620) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.7% (6) | 7.6% (213) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarks hill vs Eufaula
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Clarks hill and Eufaula at 0.0%.
- In Eufaula, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.7% compared to 20.5% in Clarks hill.
- More residents in Clarks hill have less than a high school education at 32.1% compared to 22.1% in Eufaula.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarks hill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.7% compared to 7.6% in Eufaula.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.