Demographics details for Clarkesville, GA vs Victorville, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Clarkesville, GA vs Victorville, CA.

Data Clarkesville Victorville
Population 2,112 137,221
Median Age 47.4 years 31.8 years
Median Income $64,848 $65,746
Married Families 30.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.1 7.5

Population Comparison: Clarkesville vs Victorville

  • The population in Victorville is higher at 137,221, compared to 2,112 in Clarkesville.
  • Residents in Clarkesville have a higher median age of 47.4 years compared to 31.8 years in Victorville.
  • Victorville has a higher median income of $65,746, compared to $64,848 in Clarkesville.
  • In Victorville, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 30.0% in Clarkesville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Victorville at 12%, compared to 0% in Clarkesville.
  • Victorville has a higher unemployment rate at 7.5% compared to 3.1% in Clarkesville.

Demographics

Demographics Clarkesville vs Victorville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Clarkesville Victorville
Black 8 17
White 81 4
Asian 1 4
Hispanic 4 54
Two or More Races 6 19
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Clarkesville vs Victorville

  • In Victorville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 8% in Clarkesville.
  • Clarkesville has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 4% in Victorville.
  • In Victorville, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Clarkesville.
  • Victorville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 54%, compared to 4% in Clarkesville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Victorville at 19%, compared to 6% in Clarkesville.
  • In Victorville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Clarkesville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Clarkesville Victorville
Mental Health Not Good 17.5% 18.4%
Physical Health Not Good 12.6% 14.4%
Depression 23.6% 19.0%
Smoking 18.4% 16.2%
Binge Drinking 16.3% 14.8%
Obesity 31.5% 41.3%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Clarkesville vs Victorville

  • In Victorville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 17.5% in Clarkesville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Clarkesville at 23.6% compared to 19.0% in Victorville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Clarkesville at 18.4% compared to 16.2% in Victorville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Clarkesville at 16.3% compared to 14.8% in Victorville.
  • Victorville has higher obesity rates at 41.3% compared to 31.5% in Clarkesville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Clarkesville at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Victorville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Clarkesville Victorville
No Schooling 0.3% (6) 1.7% (2,334)
High School Diploma 16.9% (356) 15.1% (20,711)
Less than High School 15.2% (322) 24.1% (33,076)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.4% (453) 6.6% (9,125)

Education Levels Comparison: Clarkesville vs Victorville

  • In Victorville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.3% in Clarkesville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Clarkesville hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 15.1% in Victorville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Victorville at 24.1%, compared to 15.2% in Clarkesville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Clarkesville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.4% compared to 6.6% in Victorville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.