Demographics details for Clarkesville, GA vs Rupert, ID
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarkesville, GA vs Rupert, ID.
| Data | Clarkesville | Rupert |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,112 | 6,238 |
| Median Age | 47.4 years | 34.1 years |
| Median Income | $64,848 | $53,348 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Clarkesville vs Rupert
- The population in Rupert is higher at 6,238, compared to 2,112 in Clarkesville.
- Residents in Clarkesville have a higher median age of 47.4 years compared to 34.1 years in Rupert.
- Clarkesville has a higher median income of $64,848 compared to $53,348 in Rupert.
- In Rupert, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 30.0% in Clarkesville.
- The poverty level is higher in Rupert at 12%, compared to 0% in Clarkesville.
- Rupert has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.1% in Clarkesville.
Demographics
Demographics Clarkesville vs Rupert provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clarkesville | Rupert |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | Data is updating |
| White | 81 | 39 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 47 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Clarkesville vs Rupert
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clarkesville at 8% compared to 0% in Rupert.
- Clarkesville has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 39% in Rupert.
- The Asian population is larger in Clarkesville at 1% compared to 0% in Rupert.
- Rupert has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 47%, compared to 4% in Clarkesville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rupert at 13%, compared to 6% in Clarkesville.
- In Rupert, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Clarkesville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clarkesville | Rupert |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 14.9% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 23.0% |
| Smoking | 18.4% | 20.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 14.0% |
| Obesity | 31.5% | 39.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarkesville vs Rupert
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Clarkesville and Rupert at 17.5%.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clarkesville at 23.6% compared to 23.0% in Rupert.
- Rupert has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 18.4% in Clarkesville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clarkesville at 16.3% compared to 14.0% in Rupert.
- Rupert has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 31.5% in Clarkesville.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Clarkesville and Rupert at 14.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clarkesville | Rupert |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (6) | 1.7% (107) |
| High School Diploma | 16.9% (356) | 16.8% (1,046) |
| Less than High School | 15.2% (322) | 25.5% (1,589) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.4% (453) | 5.7% (354) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarkesville vs Rupert
- In Rupert, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.3% in Clarkesville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarkesville hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 16.8% in Rupert.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rupert at 25.5%, compared to 15.2% in Clarkesville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarkesville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.4% compared to 5.7% in Rupert.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.