Or Compare Two Places

Demographics details for Clarkesville, GA vs Riverside, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Clarkesville, GA vs Riverside, CA.

Data Clarkesville Riverside
Population 2,112 320,764
Median Age 47.4 years 32.4 years
Median Income $64,848 $83,448
Married Families 30.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.1 4.9

Population Comparison: Clarkesville vs Riverside

  • The population in Riverside is higher at 320,764, compared to 2,112 in Clarkesville.
  • Residents in Clarkesville have a higher median age of 47.4 years compared to 32.4 years in Riverside.
  • Riverside has a higher median income of $83,448, compared to $64,848 in Clarkesville.
  • In Riverside, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 30.0% in Clarkesville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Riverside at 12%, compared to 0% in Clarkesville.
  • Riverside has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.1% in Clarkesville.

Demographics

Demographics Clarkesville vs Riverside provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Clarkesville Riverside
Black 8 6
White 81 18
Asian 1 8
Hispanic 4 55
Two or More Races 6 12
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Clarkesville vs Riverside

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clarkesville at 8% compared to 6% in Riverside.
  • Clarkesville has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 18% in Riverside.
  • In Riverside, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 1% in Clarkesville.
  • Riverside has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 55%, compared to 4% in Clarkesville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Riverside at 12%, compared to 6% in Clarkesville.
  • In Riverside, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Clarkesville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Clarkesville Riverside
Mental Health Not Good 17.5% 16.0%
Physical Health Not Good 12.6% 11.7%
Depression 23.6% 17.1%
Smoking 18.4% 13.2%
Binge Drinking 16.3% 16.1%
Obesity 31.5% 36.2%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Clarkesville vs Riverside

  • More residents in Clarkesville report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 16.0% in Riverside.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Clarkesville at 23.6% compared to 17.1% in Riverside.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Clarkesville at 18.4% compared to 13.2% in Riverside.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Clarkesville at 16.3% compared to 16.1% in Riverside.
  • Riverside has higher obesity rates at 36.2% compared to 31.5% in Clarkesville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Clarkesville at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Riverside.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Clarkesville Riverside
No Schooling 0.3% (6) 2.0% (6,286)
High School Diploma 16.9% (356) 15.7% (50,271)
Less than High School 15.2% (322) 20.3% (64,976)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.4% (453) 14.9% (47,929)

Education Levels Comparison: Clarkesville vs Riverside

  • In Riverside, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.3% in Clarkesville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Clarkesville hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 15.7% in Riverside.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Riverside at 20.3%, compared to 15.2% in Clarkesville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Clarkesville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.4% compared to 14.9% in Riverside.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.