Demographics details for Clarkesville, GA vs Middle river, MD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Clarkesville, GA vs Middle river, MD.

Data Clarkesville Middle river
Population 2,112 31,155
Median Age 47.4 years 36.7 years
Median Income $64,848 $72,970
Married Families 30.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.1 4.0

Population Comparison: Clarkesville vs Middle river

  • The population in Middle river is higher at 31,155, compared to 2,112 in Clarkesville.
  • Residents in Clarkesville have a higher median age of 47.4 years compared to 36.7 years in Middle river.
  • Middle river has a higher median income of $72,970, compared to $64,848 in Clarkesville.
  • In Middle river, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 30.0% in Clarkesville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Middle river at 8%, compared to 0% in Clarkesville.
  • Middle river has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.1% in Clarkesville.

Demographics

Demographics Clarkesville vs Middle river provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Clarkesville Middle river
Black 8 29
White 81 51
Asian 1 7
Hispanic 4 8
Two or More Races 6 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Clarkesville vs Middle river

  • In Middle river, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 8% in Clarkesville.
  • Clarkesville has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 51% in Middle river.
  • In Middle river, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Clarkesville.
  • Middle river has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 4% in Clarkesville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Clarkesville at 6% compared to 5% in Middle river.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clarkesville and Middle river at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Clarkesville Middle river
Mental Health Not Good 17.5% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 12.6% 11.1%
Depression 23.6% 24.1%
Smoking 18.4% 17.2%
Binge Drinking 16.3% 15.0%
Obesity 31.5% 38.7%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Clarkesville vs Middle river

  • In Middle river, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 17.5% in Clarkesville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Middle river at 24.1% versus 23.6% in Clarkesville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Clarkesville at 18.4% compared to 17.2% in Middle river.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Clarkesville at 16.3% compared to 15.0% in Middle river.
  • Middle river has higher obesity rates at 38.7% compared to 31.5% in Clarkesville.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Clarkesville and Middle river at 14.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Clarkesville Middle river
No Schooling 0.3% (6) 2.6% (818)
High School Diploma 16.9% (356) 20.1% (6,254)
Less than High School 15.2% (322) 14.8% (4,616)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.4% (453) 19.4% (6,048)

Education Levels Comparison: Clarkesville vs Middle river

  • In Middle river, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.3% in Clarkesville.
  • In Middle river, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.1% compared to 16.9% in Clarkesville.
  • More residents in Clarkesville have less than a high school education at 15.2% compared to 14.8% in Middle river.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Clarkesville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.4% compared to 19.4% in Middle river.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.