Demographics details for Clarkesville, GA vs Lexington, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarkesville, GA vs Lexington, TN.
Data | Clarkesville | Lexington |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,112 | 7,952 |
Median Age | 47.4 years | 36.6 years |
Median Income | $64,848 | $45,877 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Clarkesville vs Lexington
- The population in Lexington is higher at 7,952, compared to 2,112 in Clarkesville.
- Residents in Clarkesville have a higher median age of 47.4 years compared to 36.6 years in Lexington.
- Clarkesville has a higher median income of $64,848 compared to $45,877 in Lexington.
- In Lexington, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 30.0% in Clarkesville.
- The poverty level is higher in Lexington at 13%, compared to 0% in Clarkesville.
- Lexington has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.1% in Clarkesville.
Demographics
Demographics Clarkesville vs Lexington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Clarkesville | Lexington |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 17 |
White | 81 | 81 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 4 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clarkesville vs Lexington
- In Lexington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 8% in Clarkesville.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Clarkesville and Lexington at 81%.
- The Asian population is larger in Clarkesville at 1% compared to 0% in Lexington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clarkesville at 4% compared to 1% in Lexington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clarkesville at 6% compared to 1% in Lexington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clarkesville and Lexington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Clarkesville | Lexington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 21.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 15.3% |
Depression | 23.6% | 30.4% |
Smoking | 18.4% | 26.1% |
Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 14.4% |
Obesity | 31.5% | 39.9% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarkesville vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.6% compared to 17.5% in Clarkesville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lexington at 30.4% versus 23.6% in Clarkesville.
- Lexington has a higher smoking rate at 26.1% compared to 18.4% in Clarkesville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clarkesville at 16.3% compared to 14.4% in Lexington.
- Lexington has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 31.5% in Clarkesville.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Clarkesville and Lexington at 14.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Clarkesville | Lexington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (6) | 0.4% (29) |
High School Diploma | 16.9% (356) | 22.4% (1,783) |
Less than High School | 15.2% (322) | 14.6% (1,159) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.4% (453) | 9.3% (740) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarkesville vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Clarkesville.
- In Lexington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.4% compared to 16.9% in Clarkesville.
- More residents in Clarkesville have less than a high school education at 15.2% compared to 14.6% in Lexington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarkesville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.4% compared to 9.3% in Lexington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.