Demographics details for Clarkesville, GA vs Hazel, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarkesville, GA vs Hazel, KY.
| Data | Clarkesville | Hazel |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,112 | 398 |
| Median Age | 47.4 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $64,848 | $36,765 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Clarkesville vs Hazel
- In Clarkesville, the population is higher at 2,112, compared to 398 in Hazel.
- Residents in Clarkesville have a higher median age of 47.4 years compared to 38.8 years in Hazel.
- Clarkesville has a higher median income of $64,848 compared to $36,765 in Hazel.
- In Hazel, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 30.0% in Clarkesville.
- The poverty level is higher in Hazel at 14%, compared to 0% in Clarkesville.
- Hazel has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.1% in Clarkesville.
Demographics
Demographics Clarkesville vs Hazel provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clarkesville | Hazel |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 10 |
| White | 81 | 76 |
| Asian | 1 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clarkesville vs Hazel
- In Hazel, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 8% in Clarkesville.
- Clarkesville has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 76% in Hazel.
- In Hazel, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Clarkesville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clarkesville at 4% compared to 3% in Hazel.
- Both Clarkesville and Hazel have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clarkesville and Hazel at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clarkesville | Hazel |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 27.6% |
| Smoking | 18.4% | 19.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 31.5% | 38.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 35.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarkesville vs Hazel
- In Hazel, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 17.5% in Clarkesville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hazel at 27.6% versus 23.6% in Clarkesville.
- Hazel has a higher smoking rate at 19.0% compared to 18.4% in Clarkesville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clarkesville at 16.3% compared to 15.0% in Hazel.
- Hazel has higher obesity rates at 38.9% compared to 31.5% in Clarkesville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hazel at 35.0% compared to 14.0% in Clarkesville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clarkesville | Hazel |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (6) | 0.8% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 16.9% (356) | 21.9% (87) |
| Less than High School | 15.2% (322) | 21.1% (84) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.4% (453) | 9.0% (36) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarkesville vs Hazel
- In Hazel, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.3% in Clarkesville.
- In Hazel, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.9% compared to 16.9% in Clarkesville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hazel at 21.1%, compared to 15.2% in Clarkesville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarkesville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.4% compared to 9.0% in Hazel.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.