Demographics details for Clarkesville, GA vs Hanover, NH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarkesville, GA vs Hanover, NH.
Data | Clarkesville | Hanover |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,112 | 8,234 |
Median Age | 47.4 years | 22.0 years |
Median Income | $64,848 | $111,958 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Clarkesville vs Hanover
- The population in Hanover is higher at 8,234, compared to 2,112 in Clarkesville.
- Residents in Clarkesville have a higher median age of 47.4 years compared to 22.0 years in Hanover.
- Hanover has a higher median income of $111,958, compared to $64,848 in Clarkesville.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Clarkesville and Hanover at 30.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Hanover at 14%, compared to 0% in Clarkesville.
- The unemployment rate in Clarkesville is higher at 3.1%, compared to 2.5% in Hanover.
Demographics
Demographics Clarkesville vs Hanover provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Clarkesville | Hanover |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 5 |
White | 81 | 68 |
Asian | 1 | 11 |
Hispanic | 4 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 10 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clarkesville vs Hanover
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clarkesville at 8% compared to 5% in Hanover.
- Clarkesville has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 68% in Hanover.
- In Hanover, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 1% in Clarkesville.
- Hanover has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 4% in Clarkesville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hanover at 10%, compared to 6% in Clarkesville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clarkesville and Hanover at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Clarkesville | Hanover |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 13.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 8.3% |
Depression | 23.6% | 23.1% |
Smoking | 18.4% | 11.8% |
Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 16.8% |
Obesity | 31.5% | 27.7% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarkesville vs Hanover
- More residents in Clarkesville report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 13.9% in Hanover.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clarkesville at 23.6% compared to 23.1% in Hanover.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clarkesville at 18.4% compared to 11.8% in Hanover.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hanover at 16.8% compared to 16.3% in Clarkesville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clarkesville at 31.5% compared to 27.7% in Hanover.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clarkesville at 14.0% compared to 6.0% in Hanover.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Clarkesville | Hanover |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (6) | 0.2% (20) |
High School Diploma | 16.9% (356) | 1.2% (102) |
Less than High School | 15.2% (322) | 1.7% (143) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.4% (453) | 39.4% (3,242) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarkesville vs Hanover
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarkesville have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.2% in Hanover.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarkesville hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 1.2% in Hanover.
- More residents in Clarkesville have less than a high school education at 15.2% compared to 1.7% in Hanover.
- In Hanover, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.4% compared to 21.4% in Clarkesville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.