Demographics details for Clarkesville, GA vs Galveston, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Clarkesville, GA vs Galveston, TX.

Data Clarkesville Galveston
Population 2,112 53,089
Median Age 47.4 years 39.4 years
Median Income $64,848 $57,453
Married Families 30.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 16%
Unemployment Rate 3.1 4.6

Population Comparison: Clarkesville vs Galveston

  • The population in Galveston is higher at 53,089, compared to 2,112 in Clarkesville.
  • Residents in Clarkesville have a higher median age of 47.4 years compared to 39.4 years in Galveston.
  • Clarkesville has a higher median income of $64,848 compared to $57,453 in Galveston.
  • In Galveston, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 30.0% in Clarkesville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Galveston at 16%, compared to 0% in Clarkesville.
  • Galveston has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.1% in Clarkesville.

Demographics

Demographics Clarkesville vs Galveston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Clarkesville Galveston
Black 8 16
White 81 37
Asian 1 3
Hispanic 4 30
Two or More Races 6 13
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Clarkesville vs Galveston

  • In Galveston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 16% compared to 8% in Clarkesville.
  • Clarkesville has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 37% in Galveston.
  • In Galveston, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Clarkesville.
  • Galveston has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 4% in Clarkesville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Galveston at 13%, compared to 6% in Clarkesville.
  • In Galveston, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Clarkesville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Clarkesville Galveston
Mental Health Not Good 17.5% 16.9%
Physical Health Not Good 12.6% 12.3%
Depression 23.6% 21.7%
Smoking 18.4% 16.9%
Binge Drinking 16.3% 16.8%
Obesity 31.5% 37.4%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Clarkesville vs Galveston

  • More residents in Clarkesville report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 16.9% in Galveston.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Clarkesville at 23.6% compared to 21.7% in Galveston.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Clarkesville at 18.4% compared to 16.9% in Galveston.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Galveston at 16.8% compared to 16.3% in Clarkesville.
  • Galveston has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 31.5% in Clarkesville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Galveston at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Clarkesville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Clarkesville Galveston
No Schooling 0.3% (6) 1.6% (823)
High School Diploma 16.9% (356) 13.8% (7,336)
Less than High School 15.2% (322) 16.6% (8,791)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.4% (453) 23.2% (12,311)

Education Levels Comparison: Clarkesville vs Galveston

  • In Galveston, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.3% in Clarkesville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Clarkesville hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 13.8% in Galveston.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Galveston at 16.6%, compared to 15.2% in Clarkesville.
  • In Galveston, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.2% compared to 21.4% in Clarkesville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.