Demographics details for Clarkesville, GA vs Catawba, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarkesville, GA vs Catawba, SC.
Data | Clarkesville | Catawba |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,112 | 1,439 |
Median Age | 47.4 years | 32.7 years |
Median Income | $64,848 | $50,920 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Clarkesville vs Catawba
- In Clarkesville, the population is higher at 2,112, compared to 1,439 in Catawba.
- Residents in Clarkesville have a higher median age of 47.4 years compared to 32.7 years in Catawba.
- Clarkesville has a higher median income of $64,848 compared to $50,920 in Catawba.
- In Catawba, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 30.0% in Clarkesville.
- The poverty level is higher in Catawba at 12%, compared to 0% in Clarkesville.
- Catawba has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.1% in Clarkesville.
Demographics
Demographics Clarkesville vs Catawba provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Clarkesville | Catawba |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 23 |
White | 81 | 63 |
Asian | 1 | 4 |
Hispanic | 4 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clarkesville vs Catawba
- In Catawba, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 8% in Clarkesville.
- Clarkesville has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 63% in Catawba.
- In Catawba, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Clarkesville.
- Catawba has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 4% in Clarkesville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clarkesville at 6% compared to 4% in Catawba.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clarkesville and Catawba at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Clarkesville | Catawba |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 17.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 11.6% |
Depression | 23.6% | 22.2% |
Smoking | 18.4% | 17.0% |
Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 18.3% |
Obesity | 31.5% | 34.8% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarkesville vs Catawba
- More residents in Clarkesville report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 17.4% in Catawba.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clarkesville at 23.6% compared to 22.2% in Catawba.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clarkesville at 18.4% compared to 17.0% in Catawba.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Catawba at 18.3% compared to 16.3% in Clarkesville.
- Catawba has higher obesity rates at 34.8% compared to 31.5% in Clarkesville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clarkesville at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Catawba.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Clarkesville | Catawba |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (6) | 0.1% (1) |
High School Diploma | 16.9% (356) | 11.5% (166) |
Less than High School | 15.2% (322) | 15.7% (226) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.4% (453) | 21.5% (310) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarkesville vs Catawba
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarkesville have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.1% in Catawba.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarkesville hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 11.5% in Catawba.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Catawba at 15.7%, compared to 15.2% in Clarkesville.
- In Catawba, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.5% compared to 21.4% in Clarkesville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.