Demographics details for Clarkesville, GA vs Ashland, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarkesville, GA vs Ashland, NE.
Data | Clarkesville | Ashland |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,112 | 3,262 |
Median Age | 47.4 years | 37.0 years |
Median Income | $64,848 | $78,966 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 4% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Clarkesville vs Ashland
- The population in Ashland is higher at 3,262, compared to 2,112 in Clarkesville.
- Residents in Clarkesville have a higher median age of 47.4 years compared to 37.0 years in Ashland.
- Ashland has a higher median income of $78,966, compared to $64,848 in Clarkesville.
- In Ashland, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 30.0% in Clarkesville.
- The poverty level is higher in Ashland at 4%, compared to 0% in Clarkesville.
- The unemployment rate in Clarkesville is higher at 3.1%, compared to 2.5% in Ashland.
Demographics
Demographics Clarkesville vs Ashland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Clarkesville | Ashland |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | Data is updating |
White | 81 | 92 |
Asian | 1 | 3 |
Hispanic | 4 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clarkesville vs Ashland
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clarkesville at 8% compared to 0% in Ashland.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ashland at 92% compared to 81% in Clarkesville.
- In Ashland, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Clarkesville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clarkesville at 4% compared to 2% in Ashland.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clarkesville at 6% compared to 3% in Ashland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clarkesville and Ashland at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Clarkesville | Ashland |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 13.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 9.5% |
Depression | 23.6% | 17.9% |
Smoking | 18.4% | 16.7% |
Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 22.4% |
Obesity | 31.5% | 36.2% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarkesville vs Ashland
- More residents in Clarkesville report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 13.8% in Ashland.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clarkesville at 23.6% compared to 17.9% in Ashland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clarkesville at 18.4% compared to 16.7% in Ashland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ashland at 22.4% compared to 16.3% in Clarkesville.
- Ashland has higher obesity rates at 36.2% compared to 31.5% in Clarkesville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clarkesville at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Ashland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Clarkesville | Ashland |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (6) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 16.9% (356) | 15.1% (492) |
Less than High School | 15.2% (322) | 9.0% (293) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.4% (453) | 20.7% (675) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarkesville vs Ashland
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarkesville have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Ashland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarkesville hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 15.1% in Ashland.
- More residents in Clarkesville have less than a high school education at 15.2% compared to 9.0% in Ashland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarkesville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.4% compared to 20.7% in Ashland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.