Demographics details for Clarion, IA vs Moorpark, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarion, IA vs Moorpark, CA.
Data | Clarion | Moorpark |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,749 | 35,514 |
Median Age | 47.4 years | 38.8 years |
Median Income | $48,853 | $143,218 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 47.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Clarion vs Moorpark
- The population in Moorpark is higher at 35,514, compared to 2,749 in Clarion.
- Residents in Clarion have a higher median age of 47.4 years compared to 38.8 years in Moorpark.
- Moorpark has a higher median income of $143,218, compared to $48,853 in Clarion.
- In Moorpark, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 45.0% in Clarion.
- Clarion has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Moorpark.
- Moorpark has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 2.5% in Clarion.
Demographics
Demographics Clarion vs Moorpark provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Clarion | Moorpark |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 3 |
White | 76 | 38 |
Asian | 1 | 7 |
Hispanic | 16 | 34 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 17 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Clarion vs Moorpark
- In Moorpark, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Clarion.
- Clarion has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 38% in Moorpark.
- In Moorpark, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Clarion.
- Moorpark has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 16% in Clarion.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Moorpark at 17%, compared to 7% in Clarion.
- In Moorpark, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Clarion.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Clarion | Moorpark |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 13.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 8.9% |
Depression | 18.9% | 17.6% |
Smoking | 19.1% | 9.2% |
Binge Drinking | 19.8% | 17.8% |
Obesity | 40.5% | 24.7% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarion vs Moorpark
- More residents in Clarion report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 13.8% in Moorpark.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clarion at 18.9% compared to 17.6% in Moorpark.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clarion at 19.1% compared to 9.2% in Moorpark.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clarion at 19.8% compared to 17.8% in Moorpark.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clarion at 40.5% compared to 24.7% in Moorpark.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clarion at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Moorpark.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Clarion | Moorpark |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (27) | 0.8% (300) |
High School Diploma | 21.9% (602) | 9.3% (3,304) |
Less than High School | 12.9% (355) | 11.8% (4,201) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.9% (438) | 30.1% (10,699) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarion vs Moorpark
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarion have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.8% in Moorpark.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarion hold a high school diploma at 21.9% compared to 9.3% in Moorpark.
- More residents in Clarion have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 11.8% in Moorpark.
- In Moorpark, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.1% compared to 15.9% in Clarion.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.