Demographics details for Clarion, IA vs Garfield, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarion, IA vs Garfield, WA.
Data | Clarion | Garfield |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,749 | 2,363 |
Median Age | 47.4 years | 49.9 years |
Median Income | $48,853 | $57,958 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 57.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Clarion vs Garfield
- In Clarion, the population is higher at 2,749, compared to 2,363 in Garfield.
- The median age in Garfield is higher at 49.9 years, compared to 47.4 years in Clarion.
- Garfield has a higher median income of $57,958, compared to $48,853 in Clarion.
- In Garfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 57.0%, compared to 45.0% in Clarion.
- Clarion has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Garfield.
- Garfield has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 2.5% in Clarion.
Demographics
Demographics Clarion vs Garfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Clarion | Garfield |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 1 |
White | 76 | 88 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 16 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clarion vs Garfield
- In Garfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Clarion.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Garfield at 88% compared to 76% in Clarion.
- Both Clarion and Garfield have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clarion at 16% compared to 4% in Garfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clarion at 7% compared to 6% in Garfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clarion and Garfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Clarion | Garfield |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 17.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 11.0% |
Depression | 18.9% | 28.7% |
Smoking | 19.1% | 14.6% |
Binge Drinking | 19.8% | 18.2% |
Obesity | 40.5% | 40.3% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarion vs Garfield
- In Garfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 16.2% in Clarion.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Garfield at 28.7% versus 18.9% in Clarion.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clarion at 19.1% compared to 14.6% in Garfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clarion at 19.8% compared to 18.2% in Garfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clarion at 40.5% compared to 40.3% in Garfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Garfield at 23.0% compared to 13.0% in Clarion.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Clarion | Garfield |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (27) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 21.9% (602) | 15.7% (371) |
Less than High School | 12.9% (355) | 10.2% (242) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.9% (438) | 19.4% (458) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarion vs Garfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarion have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Garfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarion hold a high school diploma at 21.9% compared to 15.7% in Garfield.
- More residents in Clarion have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 10.2% in Garfield.
- In Garfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 15.9% in Clarion.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.