Demographics details for Clarington, OH vs Lisbon, ME
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarington, OH vs Lisbon, ME.
Data | Clarington | Lisbon |
---|---|---|
Population | 278 | 9,009 |
Median Age | 50.3 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $43,125 | $65,000 |
Married Families | 44.0% | Data is updating |
Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Clarington vs Lisbon
- The population in Lisbon is higher at 9,009, compared to 278 in Clarington.
- Residents in Clarington have a higher median age of 50.3 years compared to 42.0 years in Lisbon.
- Lisbon has a higher median income of $65,000, compared to $43,125 in Clarington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clarington at 44.0% compared to 0.0% in Lisbon.
- Clarington has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Lisbon.
- The unemployment rate in Clarington is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.5% in Lisbon.
Demographics
Demographics Clarington vs Lisbon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Clarington | Lisbon |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 1 |
White | 95 | 95 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 1 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clarington vs Lisbon
- In Lisbon, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Clarington.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Clarington and Lisbon at 95%.
- In Lisbon, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Clarington.
- Lisbon has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 1% in Clarington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clarington at 4% compared to 1% in Lisbon.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clarington and Lisbon at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Clarington | Lisbon |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 25.4% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 22.6% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 19.5% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 39.1% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarington vs Lisbon
- More residents in Clarington report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 0.0% in Lisbon.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clarington at 25.4% compared to 0.0% in Lisbon.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clarington at 22.6% compared to 0.0% in Lisbon.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clarington at 19.5% compared to 0.0% in Lisbon.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clarington at 39.1% compared to 0.0% in Lisbon.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clarington at 13.0% compared to 0.0% in Lisbon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Clarington | Lisbon |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (1) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 44.6% (124) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 12.2% (34) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.8% (16) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarington vs Lisbon
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarington have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Lisbon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarington hold a high school diploma at 44.6% compared to 0.0% in Lisbon.
- More residents in Clarington have less than a high school education at 12.2% compared to 0.0% in Lisbon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 5.8% compared to 0.0% in Lisbon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.