Demographics details for Clarendon, TX vs Leesburg, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarendon, TX vs Leesburg, VA.
| Data | Clarendon | Leesburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,948 | 48,974 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 34.8 years |
| Median Income | $47,457 | $132,298 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.8 |
Population Comparison: Clarendon vs Leesburg
- The population in Leesburg is higher at 48,974, compared to 1,948 in Clarendon.
- The median age in Leesburg is higher at 34.8 years, compared to 33.7 years in Clarendon.
- Leesburg has a higher median income of $132,298, compared to $47,457 in Clarendon.
- In Leesburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 25.0% in Clarendon.
- Clarendon has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Leesburg.
- The unemployment rate in Clarendon is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.8% in Leesburg.
Demographics
Demographics Clarendon vs Leesburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clarendon | Leesburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 10 |
| White | 76 | 50 |
| Asian | 4 | 10 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Clarendon vs Leesburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clarendon at 11% compared to 10% in Leesburg.
- Clarendon has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 50% in Leesburg.
- In Leesburg, the Asian population stands at 10%, greater than 4% in Clarendon.
- Leesburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 6% in Clarendon.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Leesburg at 12%, compared to 3% in Clarendon.
- In Leesburg, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Clarendon.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clarendon | Leesburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 14.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | 8.7% |
| Depression | 25.8% | 18.6% |
| Smoking | 20.1% | 10.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 38.4% | 33.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarendon vs Leesburg
- More residents in Clarendon report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 14.1% in Leesburg.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clarendon at 25.8% compared to 18.6% in Leesburg.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clarendon at 20.1% compared to 10.7% in Leesburg.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clarendon at 18.3% compared to 17.7% in Leesburg.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clarendon at 38.4% compared to 33.4% in Leesburg.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clarendon at 8.0% compared to 7.0% in Leesburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clarendon | Leesburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (14) | 0.8% (376) |
| High School Diploma | 11.4% (222) | 8.6% (4,195) |
| Less than High School | 17.6% (342) | 7.4% (3,619) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (142) | 36.0% (17,628) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarendon vs Leesburg
- In Leesburg, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.7% in Clarendon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarendon hold a high school diploma at 11.4% compared to 8.6% in Leesburg.
- More residents in Clarendon have less than a high school education at 17.6% compared to 7.4% in Leesburg.
- In Leesburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.0% compared to 7.3% in Clarendon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.