Demographics details for Clarendon, TX vs Lancaster, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarendon, TX vs Lancaster, VA.
| Data | Clarendon | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,948 | 10,750 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 59.2 years |
| Median Income | $47,457 | $62,674 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Clarendon vs Lancaster
- The population in Lancaster is higher at 10,750, compared to 1,948 in Clarendon.
- The median age in Lancaster is higher at 59.2 years, compared to 33.7 years in Clarendon.
- Lancaster has a higher median income of $62,674, compared to $47,457 in Clarendon.
- In Lancaster, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 25.0% in Clarendon.
- The poverty level is identical in both Clarendon and Lancaster at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in Clarendon is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.1% in Lancaster.
Demographics
Demographics Clarendon vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clarendon | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 28 |
| White | 76 | 66 |
| Asian | 4 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clarendon vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 28% compared to 11% in Clarendon.
- Clarendon has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 66% in Lancaster.
- The Asian population is larger in Clarendon at 4% compared to 1% in Lancaster.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clarendon at 6% compared to 2% in Lancaster.
- Both Clarendon and Lancaster have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 3%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clarendon and Lancaster at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clarendon | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 25.8% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 20.1% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 38.4% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarendon vs Lancaster
- More residents in Clarendon report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 16.4% in Lancaster.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clarendon at 25.8% compared to 22.2% in Lancaster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clarendon at 20.1% compared to 16.4% in Lancaster.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clarendon at 18.3% compared to 16.3% in Lancaster.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clarendon at 38.4% compared to 37.3% in Lancaster.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lancaster at 17.0% compared to 8.0% in Clarendon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clarendon | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (14) | 1.5% (164) |
| High School Diploma | 11.4% (222) | 20.9% (2,244) |
| Less than High School | 17.6% (342) | 17.0% (1,823) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (142) | 26.3% (2,823) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarendon vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.7% in Clarendon.
- In Lancaster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.9% compared to 11.4% in Clarendon.
- More residents in Clarendon have less than a high school education at 17.6% compared to 17.0% in Lancaster.
- In Lancaster, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 7.3% in Clarendon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.