Demographics details for Clarendon, TX vs Jefferson city, MO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Clarendon, TX vs Jefferson city, MO.

Data Clarendon Jefferson city
Population 1,948 42,528
Median Age 33.7 years 38.5 years
Median Income $47,457 $63,649
Married Families 25.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 10% 11%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.9

Population Comparison: Clarendon vs Jefferson city

  • The population in Jefferson city is higher at 42,528, compared to 1,948 in Clarendon.
  • The median age in Jefferson city is higher at 38.5 years, compared to 33.7 years in Clarendon.
  • Jefferson city has a higher median income of $63,649, compared to $47,457 in Clarendon.
  • In Jefferson city, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 25.0% in Clarendon.
  • The poverty level is higher in Jefferson city at 11%, compared to 10% in Clarendon.
  • Jefferson city has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.5% in Clarendon.

Demographics

Demographics Clarendon vs Jefferson city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Clarendon Jefferson city
Black 11 18
White 76 72
Asian 4 3
Hispanic 6 3
Two or More Races 3 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Clarendon vs Jefferson city

  • In Jefferson city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 11% in Clarendon.
  • Clarendon has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 72% in Jefferson city.
  • The Asian population is larger in Clarendon at 4% compared to 3% in Jefferson city.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Clarendon at 6% compared to 3% in Jefferson city.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Jefferson city at 4%, compared to 3% in Clarendon.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clarendon and Jefferson city at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Clarendon Jefferson city
Mental Health Not Good 19.2% 17.1%
Physical Health Not Good 13.0% 11.6%
Depression 25.8% 22.6%
Smoking 20.1% 18.6%
Binge Drinking 18.3% 16.9%
Obesity 38.4% 37.4%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Clarendon vs Jefferson city

  • More residents in Clarendon report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 17.1% in Jefferson city.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Clarendon at 25.8% compared to 22.6% in Jefferson city.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Clarendon at 20.1% compared to 18.6% in Jefferson city.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Clarendon at 18.3% compared to 16.9% in Jefferson city.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Clarendon at 38.4% compared to 37.4% in Jefferson city.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Jefferson city at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Clarendon.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Clarendon Jefferson city
No Schooling 0.7% (14) 0.5% (233)
High School Diploma 11.4% (222) 15.9% (6,767)
Less than High School 17.6% (342) 11.0% (4,659)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.3% (142) 24.8% (10,543)

Education Levels Comparison: Clarendon vs Jefferson city

  • A higher percentage of residents in Clarendon have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Jefferson city.
  • In Jefferson city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.9% compared to 11.4% in Clarendon.
  • More residents in Clarendon have less than a high school education at 17.6% compared to 11.0% in Jefferson city.
  • In Jefferson city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.8% compared to 7.3% in Clarendon.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.