Demographics details for Clarendon, TX vs Glendale, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarendon, TX vs Glendale, AZ.
| Data | Clarendon | Glendale |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,948 | 252,136 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 34.1 years |
| Median Income | $47,457 | $66,375 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Clarendon vs Glendale
- The population in Glendale is higher at 252,136, compared to 1,948 in Clarendon.
- The median age in Glendale is higher at 34.1 years, compared to 33.7 years in Clarendon.
- Glendale has a higher median income of $66,375, compared to $47,457 in Clarendon.
- In Glendale, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 25.0% in Clarendon.
- The poverty level is higher in Glendale at 11%, compared to 10% in Clarendon.
- Glendale has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.5% in Clarendon.
Demographics
Demographics Clarendon vs Glendale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clarendon | Glendale |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 7 |
| White | 76 | 28 |
| Asian | 4 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 40 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 19 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Clarendon vs Glendale
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clarendon at 11% compared to 7% in Glendale.
- Clarendon has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 28% in Glendale.
- Both Clarendon and Glendale have the same percentage of Asian residents at 4%.
- Glendale has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 40%, compared to 6% in Clarendon.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Glendale at 19%, compared to 3% in Clarendon.
- In Glendale, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Clarendon.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clarendon | Glendale |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 25.8% | 20.2% |
| Smoking | 20.1% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 38.4% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarendon vs Glendale
- More residents in Clarendon report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 18.4% in Glendale.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clarendon at 25.8% compared to 20.2% in Glendale.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clarendon at 20.1% compared to 17.2% in Glendale.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clarendon at 18.3% compared to 16.8% in Glendale.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clarendon at 38.4% compared to 32.9% in Glendale.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Glendale at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Clarendon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clarendon | Glendale |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (14) | 1.7% (4,190) |
| High School Diploma | 11.4% (222) | 14.7% (37,119) |
| Less than High School | 17.6% (342) | 18.6% (46,911) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (142) | 14.2% (35,878) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarendon vs Glendale
- In Glendale, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.7% in Clarendon.
- In Glendale, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.7% compared to 11.4% in Clarendon.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Glendale at 18.6%, compared to 17.6% in Clarendon.
- In Glendale, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.2% compared to 7.3% in Clarendon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.