Demographics details for Clarendon, TX vs Forest lake, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarendon, TX vs Forest lake, MN.
| Data | Clarendon | Forest lake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,948 | 20,857 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 37.9 years |
| Median Income | $47,457 | $91,157 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Clarendon vs Forest lake
- The population in Forest lake is higher at 20,857, compared to 1,948 in Clarendon.
- The median age in Forest lake is higher at 37.9 years, compared to 33.7 years in Clarendon.
- Forest lake has a higher median income of $91,157, compared to $47,457 in Clarendon.
- In Forest lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 25.0% in Clarendon.
- Clarendon has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Forest lake.
- The unemployment rate in Clarendon is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Forest lake.
Demographics
Demographics Clarendon vs Forest lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clarendon | Forest lake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 3 |
| White | 76 | 81 |
| Asian | 4 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clarendon vs Forest lake
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clarendon at 11% compared to 3% in Forest lake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Forest lake at 81% compared to 76% in Clarendon.
- Both Clarendon and Forest lake have the same percentage of Asian residents at 4%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Clarendon and Forest lake at 6%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Forest lake at 6%, compared to 3% in Clarendon.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clarendon and Forest lake at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clarendon | Forest lake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 14.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | 8.8% |
| Depression | 25.8% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 20.1% | 15.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 21.4% |
| Obesity | 38.4% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarendon vs Forest lake
- More residents in Clarendon report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 14.7% in Forest lake.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clarendon at 25.8% compared to 24.1% in Forest lake.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clarendon at 20.1% compared to 15.7% in Forest lake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Forest lake at 21.4% compared to 18.3% in Clarendon.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clarendon at 38.4% compared to 32.9% in Forest lake.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Forest lake at 10.0% compared to 8.0% in Clarendon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clarendon | Forest lake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (14) | 0.5% (101) |
| High School Diploma | 11.4% (222) | 14.6% (3,055) |
| Less than High School | 17.6% (342) | 7.7% (1,615) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (142) | 24.6% (5,123) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarendon vs Forest lake
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarendon have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Forest lake.
- In Forest lake, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.6% compared to 11.4% in Clarendon.
- More residents in Clarendon have less than a high school education at 17.6% compared to 7.7% in Forest lake.
- In Forest lake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.6% compared to 7.3% in Clarendon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.