Demographics details for Clarendon, TX vs Burkesville, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarendon, TX vs Burkesville, KY.
Data | Clarendon | Burkesville |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,948 | 1,380 |
Median Age | 33.7 years | 51.6 years |
Median Income | $47,457 | $26,563 |
Married Families | 25.0% | 29.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Clarendon vs Burkesville
- In Clarendon, the population is higher at 1,948, compared to 1,380 in Burkesville.
- The median age in Burkesville is higher at 51.6 years, compared to 33.7 years in Clarendon.
- Clarendon has a higher median income of $47,457 compared to $26,563 in Burkesville.
- In Burkesville, the percentage of married families is higher at 29.0%, compared to 25.0% in Clarendon.
- The poverty level is higher in Burkesville at 14%, compared to 10% in Clarendon.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Clarendon and Burkesville at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Clarendon vs Burkesville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Clarendon | Burkesville |
---|---|---|
Black | 11 | 11 |
White | 76 | 83 |
Asian | 4 | 1 |
Hispanic | 6 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clarendon vs Burkesville
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Clarendon and Burkesville at 11%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Burkesville at 83% compared to 76% in Clarendon.
- The Asian population is larger in Clarendon at 4% compared to 1% in Burkesville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clarendon at 6% compared to 3% in Burkesville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clarendon at 3% compared to 2% in Burkesville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clarendon and Burkesville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Clarendon | Burkesville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 21.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | 16.8% |
Depression | 25.8% | 29.6% |
Smoking | 20.1% | 27.1% |
Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 13.7% |
Obesity | 38.4% | 43.9% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 28.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarendon vs Burkesville
- In Burkesville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.8% compared to 19.2% in Clarendon.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Burkesville at 29.6% versus 25.8% in Clarendon.
- Burkesville has a higher smoking rate at 27.1% compared to 20.1% in Clarendon.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clarendon at 18.3% compared to 13.7% in Burkesville.
- Burkesville has higher obesity rates at 43.9% compared to 38.4% in Clarendon.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Burkesville at 28.0% compared to 8.0% in Clarendon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Clarendon | Burkesville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (14) | 0.6% (8) |
High School Diploma | 11.4% (222) | 32.7% (451) |
Less than High School | 17.6% (342) | 35.8% (494) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (142) | 5.2% (72) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarendon vs Burkesville
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarendon have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in Burkesville.
- In Burkesville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 32.7% compared to 11.4% in Clarendon.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Burkesville at 35.8%, compared to 17.6% in Clarendon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarendon hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.3% compared to 5.2% in Burkesville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.