Demographics details for Claremont, NC vs Tullahoma, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Claremont, NC vs Tullahoma, TN.
| Data | Claremont | Tullahoma |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,715 | 20,830 |
| Median Age | 44.5 years | 40.2 years |
| Median Income | $60,735 | $56,771 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Claremont vs Tullahoma
- The population in Tullahoma is higher at 20,830, compared to 1,715 in Claremont.
- Residents in Claremont have a higher median age of 44.5 years compared to 40.2 years in Tullahoma.
- Claremont has a higher median income of $60,735 compared to $56,771 in Tullahoma.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Claremont at 45.0% compared to 41.0% in Tullahoma.
- Claremont has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Tullahoma.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Claremont and Tullahoma at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Claremont vs Tullahoma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Claremont | Tullahoma |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 6 |
| White | 74 | 83 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Claremont vs Tullahoma
- In Tullahoma, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 4% in Claremont.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Tullahoma at 83% compared to 74% in Claremont.
- In Tullahoma, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Claremont.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Claremont at 10% compared to 5% in Tullahoma.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Claremont at 11% compared to 4% in Tullahoma.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Claremont and Tullahoma at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Claremont | Tullahoma |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 19.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 25.9% | 28.9% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 22.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 35.1% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Claremont vs Tullahoma
- In Tullahoma, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 16.8% in Claremont.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Tullahoma at 28.9% versus 25.9% in Claremont.
- Tullahoma has a higher smoking rate at 22.6% compared to 17.5% in Claremont.
- Binge drinking is more common in Claremont at 19.2% compared to 15.1% in Tullahoma.
- Tullahoma has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 35.1% in Claremont.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Tullahoma at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Claremont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Claremont | Tullahoma |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (6) | 0.6% (117) |
| High School Diploma | 27.6% (474) | 18.9% (3,932) |
| Less than High School | 10.7% (184) | 14.1% (2,944) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.7% (287) | 19.3% (4,012) |
Education Levels Comparison: Claremont vs Tullahoma
- In Tullahoma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in Claremont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Claremont hold a high school diploma at 27.6% compared to 18.9% in Tullahoma.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tullahoma at 14.1%, compared to 10.7% in Claremont.
- In Tullahoma, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 16.7% in Claremont.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.