Demographics details for Claremont, NC vs Port lavaca, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Claremont, NC vs Port lavaca, TX.
| Data | Claremont | Port lavaca |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,715 | 11,262 |
| Median Age | 44.5 years | 34.8 years |
| Median Income | $60,735 | $58,871 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Claremont vs Port lavaca
- The population in Port lavaca is higher at 11,262, compared to 1,715 in Claremont.
- Residents in Claremont have a higher median age of 44.5 years compared to 34.8 years in Port lavaca.
- Claremont has a higher median income of $60,735 compared to $58,871 in Port lavaca.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Claremont at 45.0% compared to 42.0% in Port lavaca.
- The poverty level is higher in Port lavaca at 15%, compared to 12% in Claremont.
- Port lavaca has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Claremont.
Demographics
Demographics Claremont vs Port lavaca provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Claremont | Port lavaca |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 5 |
| White | 74 | 6 |
| Asian | 1 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 64 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Claremont vs Port lavaca
- In Port lavaca, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 4% in Claremont.
- Claremont has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 6% in Port lavaca.
- In Port lavaca, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Claremont.
- Port lavaca has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 64%, compared to 10% in Claremont.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Port lavaca at 18%, compared to 11% in Claremont.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Claremont and Port lavaca at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Claremont | Port lavaca |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 17.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 25.9% | 21.5% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 17.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 35.1% | 38.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Claremont vs Port lavaca
- In Port lavaca, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 16.8% in Claremont.
- Depression is more prevalent in Claremont at 25.9% compared to 21.5% in Port lavaca.
- Smoking rates are the same in both Claremont and Port lavaca at 17.5%.
- Binge drinking is more common in Claremont at 19.2% compared to 16.9% in Port lavaca.
- Port lavaca has higher obesity rates at 38.4% compared to 35.1% in Claremont.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Port lavaca at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Claremont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Claremont | Port lavaca |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (6) | 2.0% (230) |
| High School Diploma | 27.6% (474) | 21.3% (2,404) |
| Less than High School | 10.7% (184) | 24.2% (2,728) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.7% (287) | 9.7% (1,091) |
Education Levels Comparison: Claremont vs Port lavaca
- In Port lavaca, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.3% in Claremont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Claremont hold a high school diploma at 27.6% compared to 21.3% in Port lavaca.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Port lavaca at 24.2%, compared to 10.7% in Claremont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Claremont hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.7% compared to 9.7% in Port lavaca.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.