Demographics details for Claremont, NC vs Lamesa, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Claremont, NC vs Lamesa, TX.
| Data | Claremont | Lamesa |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,715 | 8,425 |
| Median Age | 44.5 years | 33.1 years |
| Median Income | $60,735 | $39,434 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Claremont vs Lamesa
- The population in Lamesa is higher at 8,425, compared to 1,715 in Claremont.
- Residents in Claremont have a higher median age of 44.5 years compared to 33.1 years in Lamesa.
- Claremont has a higher median income of $60,735 compared to $39,434 in Lamesa.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Claremont at 45.0% compared to 31.0% in Lamesa.
- The poverty level is higher in Lamesa at 18%, compared to 12% in Claremont.
- Lamesa has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.5% in Claremont.
Demographics
Demographics Claremont vs Lamesa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Claremont | Lamesa |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 3 |
| White | 74 | 5 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 10 | 73 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 19 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Claremont vs Lamesa
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Claremont at 4% compared to 3% in Lamesa.
- Claremont has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 5% in Lamesa.
- The Asian population is larger in Claremont at 1% compared to 0% in Lamesa.
- Lamesa has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 73%, compared to 10% in Claremont.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lamesa at 19%, compared to 11% in Claremont.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Claremont and Lamesa at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Claremont | Lamesa |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 19.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 16.4% |
| Depression | 25.9% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | 35.1% | 41.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Claremont vs Lamesa
- In Lamesa, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 16.8% in Claremont.
- Depression is more prevalent in Claremont at 25.9% compared to 24.0% in Lamesa.
- Lamesa has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 17.5% in Claremont.
- Binge drinking is more common in Claremont at 19.2% compared to 15.6% in Lamesa.
- Lamesa has higher obesity rates at 41.2% compared to 35.1% in Claremont.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lamesa at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Claremont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Claremont | Lamesa |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (6) | 3.3% (278) |
| High School Diploma | 27.6% (474) | 18.4% (1,547) |
| Less than High School | 10.7% (184) | 34.2% (2,881) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.7% (287) | 8.7% (736) |
Education Levels Comparison: Claremont vs Lamesa
- In Lamesa, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.3% compared to 0.3% in Claremont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Claremont hold a high school diploma at 27.6% compared to 18.4% in Lamesa.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lamesa at 34.2%, compared to 10.7% in Claremont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Claremont hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.7% compared to 8.7% in Lamesa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.