Demographics details for Claremont, NC vs Healdton, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Claremont, NC vs Healdton, OK.
| Data | Claremont | Healdton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,715 | 2,334 |
| Median Age | 44.5 years | 42.9 years |
| Median Income | $60,735 | $45,721 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Claremont vs Healdton
- The population in Healdton is higher at 2,334, compared to 1,715 in Claremont.
- Residents in Claremont have a higher median age of 44.5 years compared to 42.9 years in Healdton.
- Claremont has a higher median income of $60,735 compared to $45,721 in Healdton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Claremont at 45.0% compared to 31.0% in Healdton.
- Claremont has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Healdton.
- Healdton has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Claremont.
Demographics
Demographics Claremont vs Healdton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Claremont | Healdton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 1 |
| White | 74 | 75 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 10 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 5 |
Demographics Comparison: Claremont vs Healdton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Claremont at 4% compared to 1% in Healdton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Healdton at 75% compared to 74% in Claremont.
- The Asian population is larger in Claremont at 1% compared to 0% in Healdton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Claremont at 10% compared to 8% in Healdton.
- Both Claremont and Healdton have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 11%.
- In Healdton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 5%, compared to 0% in Claremont.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Claremont | Healdton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 20.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 14.9% |
| Depression | 25.9% | 28.2% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 24.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 35.1% | 42.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Claremont vs Healdton
- In Healdton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 16.8% in Claremont.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Healdton at 28.2% versus 25.9% in Claremont.
- Healdton has a higher smoking rate at 24.9% compared to 17.5% in Claremont.
- Binge drinking is more common in Claremont at 19.2% compared to 14.6% in Healdton.
- Healdton has higher obesity rates at 42.2% compared to 35.1% in Claremont.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Healdton at 26.0% compared to 11.0% in Claremont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Claremont | Healdton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (6) | 3.4% (80) |
| High School Diploma | 27.6% (474) | 24.2% (565) |
| Less than High School | 10.7% (184) | 25.1% (587) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.7% (287) | 11.8% (276) |
Education Levels Comparison: Claremont vs Healdton
- In Healdton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.4% compared to 0.3% in Claremont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Claremont hold a high school diploma at 27.6% compared to 24.2% in Healdton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Healdton at 25.1%, compared to 10.7% in Claremont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Claremont hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.7% compared to 11.8% in Healdton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.