Demographics details for Claremont, CA vs Trumann, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Claremont, CA vs Trumann, AR.
| Data | Claremont | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 36,001 | 7,305 |
| Median Age | 41.5 years | 40.0 years |
| Median Income | $115,091 | $37,618 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Claremont vs Trumann
- In Claremont, the population is higher at 36,001, compared to 7,305 in Trumann.
- Residents in Claremont have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 40.0 years in Trumann.
- Claremont has a higher median income of $115,091 compared to $37,618 in Trumann.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Claremont at 42.0% compared to 35.0% in Trumann.
- The poverty level is higher in Trumann at 13%, compared to 6% in Claremont.
- The unemployment rate in Claremont is higher at 5.4%, compared to 4.2% in Trumann.
Demographics
Demographics Claremont vs Trumann provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Claremont | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 5 |
| White | 37 | 84 |
| Asian | 16 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 25 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Claremont vs Trumann
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Claremont at 6% compared to 5% in Trumann.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Trumann at 84% compared to 37% in Claremont.
- The Asian population is larger in Claremont at 16% compared to 0% in Trumann.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Claremont at 25% compared to 3% in Trumann.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Claremont at 16% compared to 8% in Trumann.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Claremont and Trumann at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Claremont | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.0% | 20.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 15.2% |
| Depression | 16.3% | 28.5% |
| Smoking | 8.2% | 25.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 14.4% |
| Obesity | 24.5% | 44.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Claremont vs Trumann
- In Trumann, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 14.0% in Claremont.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Trumann at 28.5% versus 16.3% in Claremont.
- Trumann has a higher smoking rate at 25.0% compared to 8.2% in Claremont.
- Binge drinking is more common in Claremont at 16.7% compared to 14.4% in Trumann.
- Trumann has higher obesity rates at 44.6% compared to 24.5% in Claremont.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Trumann at 24.0% compared to 11.0% in Claremont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Claremont | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (403) | 1.8% (135) |
| High School Diploma | 6.7% (2,427) | 25.9% (1,895) |
| Less than High School | 6.2% (2,248) | 24.4% (1,780) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 39.5% (14,204) | 6.7% (487) |
Education Levels Comparison: Claremont vs Trumann
- In Trumann, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.1% in Claremont.
- In Trumann, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.9% compared to 6.7% in Claremont.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Trumann at 24.4%, compared to 6.2% in Claremont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Claremont hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.5% compared to 6.7% in Trumann.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.