Demographics details for Claremont, CA vs Sulphur springs, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Claremont, CA vs Sulphur springs, TX.
Data | Claremont | Sulphur springs |
---|---|---|
Population | 36,001 | 16,408 |
Median Age | 41.5 years | 39.4 years |
Median Income | $115,091 | $54,950 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Claremont vs Sulphur springs
- In Claremont, the population is higher at 36,001, compared to 16,408 in Sulphur springs.
- Residents in Claremont have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 39.4 years in Sulphur springs.
- Claremont has a higher median income of $115,091 compared to $54,950 in Sulphur springs.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Claremont at 42.0% compared to 39.0% in Sulphur springs.
- The poverty level is higher in Sulphur springs at 15%, compared to 6% in Claremont.
- The unemployment rate in Claremont is higher at 5.4%, compared to 4.5% in Sulphur springs.
Demographics
Demographics Claremont vs Sulphur springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Claremont | Sulphur springs |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 14 |
White | 37 | 63 |
Asian | 16 | 1 |
Hispanic | 25 | 17 |
Two or More Races | 16 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Claremont vs Sulphur springs
- In Sulphur springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 14% compared to 6% in Claremont.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sulphur springs at 63% compared to 37% in Claremont.
- The Asian population is larger in Claremont at 16% compared to 1% in Sulphur springs.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Claremont at 25% compared to 17% in Sulphur springs.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Claremont at 16% compared to 5% in Sulphur springs.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Claremont and Sulphur springs at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Claremont | Sulphur springs |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.0% | 19.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 13.2% |
Depression | 16.3% | 24.8% |
Smoking | 8.2% | 20.1% |
Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 17.5% |
Obesity | 24.5% | 39.5% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Claremont vs Sulphur springs
- In Sulphur springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 14.0% in Claremont.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sulphur springs at 24.8% versus 16.3% in Claremont.
- Sulphur springs has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 8.2% in Claremont.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sulphur springs at 17.5% compared to 16.7% in Claremont.
- Sulphur springs has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 24.5% in Claremont.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sulphur springs at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Claremont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Claremont | Sulphur springs |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (403) | 0.8% (127) |
High School Diploma | 6.7% (2,427) | 18.3% (3,003) |
Less than High School | 6.2% (2,248) | 16.0% (2,628) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 39.5% (14,204) | 13.7% (2,248) |
Education Levels Comparison: Claremont vs Sulphur springs
- A higher percentage of residents in Claremont have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.8% in Sulphur springs.
- In Sulphur springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.3% compared to 6.7% in Claremont.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sulphur springs at 16.0%, compared to 6.2% in Claremont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Claremont hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.5% compared to 13.7% in Sulphur springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.