Demographics details for Claremont, CA vs Show low, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Claremont, CA vs Show low, AZ.
| Data | Claremont | Show low |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 36,001 | 12,056 |
| Median Age | 41.5 years | 43.6 years |
| Median Income | $115,091 | $57,406 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Claremont vs Show low
- In Claremont, the population is higher at 36,001, compared to 12,056 in Show low.
- The median age in Show low is higher at 43.6 years, compared to 41.5 years in Claremont.
- Claremont has a higher median income of $115,091 compared to $57,406 in Show low.
- In Show low, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 42.0% in Claremont.
- The poverty level is higher in Show low at 10%, compared to 6% in Claremont.
- The unemployment rate in Claremont is higher at 5.4%, compared to 4.5% in Show low.
Demographics
Demographics Claremont vs Show low provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Claremont | Show low |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | Data is updating |
| White | 37 | 70 |
| Asian | 16 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 25 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Claremont vs Show low
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Claremont at 6% compared to 0% in Show low.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Show low at 70% compared to 37% in Claremont.
- The Asian population is larger in Claremont at 16% compared to 1% in Show low.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Claremont at 25% compared to 18% in Show low.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Claremont at 16% compared to 9% in Show low.
- In Show low, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Claremont.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Claremont | Show low |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.0% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 16.3% | 20.7% |
| Smoking | 8.2% | 14.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 24.5% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Claremont vs Show low
- In Show low, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 14.0% in Claremont.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Show low at 20.7% versus 16.3% in Claremont.
- Show low has a higher smoking rate at 14.6% compared to 8.2% in Claremont.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Show low at 17.9% compared to 16.7% in Claremont.
- Show low has higher obesity rates at 32.9% compared to 24.5% in Claremont.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Show low at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Claremont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Claremont | Show low |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (403) | 0.1% (12) |
| High School Diploma | 6.7% (2,427) | 14.3% (1,726) |
| Less than High School | 6.2% (2,248) | 7.0% (844) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 39.5% (14,204) | 19.1% (2,306) |
Education Levels Comparison: Claremont vs Show low
- A higher percentage of residents in Claremont have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.1% in Show low.
- In Show low, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.3% compared to 6.7% in Claremont.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Show low at 7.0%, compared to 6.2% in Claremont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Claremont hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.5% compared to 19.1% in Show low.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.