Demographics details for Claremont, CA vs Mountain home, AR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Claremont, CA vs Mountain home, AR.

Data Claremont Mountain home
Population 36,001 13,150
Median Age 41.5 years 41.8 years
Median Income $115,091 $42,281
Married Families 42.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 6% 14%
Unemployment Rate 5.4 3.5

Population Comparison: Claremont vs Mountain home

  • In Claremont, the population is higher at 36,001, compared to 13,150 in Mountain home.
  • The median age in Mountain home is higher at 41.8 years, compared to 41.5 years in Claremont.
  • Claremont has a higher median income of $115,091 compared to $42,281 in Mountain home.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Claremont at 42.0% compared to 38.0% in Mountain home.
  • The poverty level is higher in Mountain home at 14%, compared to 6% in Claremont.
  • The unemployment rate in Claremont is higher at 5.4%, compared to 3.5% in Mountain home.

Demographics

Demographics Claremont vs Mountain home provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Claremont Mountain home
Black 6 Data is updating
White 37 90
Asian 16 1
Hispanic 25 4
Two or More Races 16 4
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Claremont vs Mountain home

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Claremont at 6% compared to 0% in Mountain home.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Mountain home at 90% compared to 37% in Claremont.
  • The Asian population is larger in Claremont at 16% compared to 1% in Mountain home.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Claremont at 25% compared to 4% in Mountain home.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Claremont at 16% compared to 4% in Mountain home.
  • In Mountain home, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Claremont.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Claremont Mountain home
Mental Health Not Good 14.0% 19.2%
Physical Health Not Good 8.5% 12.9%
Depression 16.3% 28.5%
Smoking 8.2% 21.1%
Binge Drinking 16.7% 16.3%
Obesity 24.5% 34.3%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 22.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Claremont vs Mountain home

  • In Mountain home, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 14.0% in Claremont.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Mountain home at 28.5% versus 16.3% in Claremont.
  • Mountain home has a higher smoking rate at 21.1% compared to 8.2% in Claremont.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Claremont at 16.7% compared to 16.3% in Mountain home.
  • Mountain home has higher obesity rates at 34.3% compared to 24.5% in Claremont.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mountain home at 22.0% compared to 11.0% in Claremont.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Claremont Mountain home
No Schooling 1.1% (403) 0.7% (87)
High School Diploma 6.7% (2,427) 16.9% (2,225)
Less than High School 6.2% (2,248) 14.2% (1,870)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 39.5% (14,204) 15.0% (1,973)

Education Levels Comparison: Claremont vs Mountain home

  • A higher percentage of residents in Claremont have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.7% in Mountain home.
  • In Mountain home, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.9% compared to 6.7% in Claremont.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mountain home at 14.2%, compared to 6.2% in Claremont.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Claremont hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.5% compared to 15.0% in Mountain home.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.