Demographics details for Claremont, CA vs Mccurtain, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Claremont, CA vs Mccurtain, OK.
| Data | Claremont | Mccurtain |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 36,001 | 30,931 |
| Median Age | 41.5 years | 38.2 years |
| Median Income | $115,091 | $47,046 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Claremont vs Mccurtain
- In Claremont, the population is higher at 36,001, compared to 30,931 in Mccurtain.
- Residents in Claremont have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 38.2 years in Mccurtain.
- Claremont has a higher median income of $115,091 compared to $47,046 in Mccurtain.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Claremont at 42.0% compared to 37.0% in Mccurtain.
- The poverty level is higher in Mccurtain at 12%, compared to 6% in Claremont.
- The unemployment rate in Claremont is higher at 5.4%, compared to 4.6% in Mccurtain.
Demographics
Demographics Claremont vs Mccurtain provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Claremont | Mccurtain |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 8 |
| White | 37 | 58 |
| Asian | 16 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 25 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 14 |
Demographics Comparison: Claremont vs Mccurtain
- In Mccurtain, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 6% in Claremont.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mccurtain at 58% compared to 37% in Claremont.
- The Asian population is larger in Claremont at 16% compared to 1% in Mccurtain.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Claremont at 25% compared to 7% in Mccurtain.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Claremont at 16% compared to 12% in Mccurtain.
- In Mccurtain, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 14%, compared to 0% in Claremont.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Claremont | Mccurtain |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.0% | 20.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 15.2% |
| Depression | 16.3% | 26.9% |
| Smoking | 8.2% | 25.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 24.5% | 46.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Claremont vs Mccurtain
- In Mccurtain, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 14.0% in Claremont.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mccurtain at 26.9% versus 16.3% in Claremont.
- Mccurtain has a higher smoking rate at 25.0% compared to 8.2% in Claremont.
- Binge drinking is more common in Claremont at 16.7% compared to 13.7% in Mccurtain.
- Mccurtain has higher obesity rates at 46.9% compared to 24.5% in Claremont.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mccurtain at 21.0% compared to 11.0% in Claremont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Claremont | Mccurtain |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (403) | 0.7% (209) |
| High School Diploma | 6.7% (2,427) | 23.5% (7,268) |
| Less than High School | 6.2% (2,248) | 17.2% (5,334) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 39.5% (14,204) | 10.3% (3,200) |
Education Levels Comparison: Claremont vs Mccurtain
- A higher percentage of residents in Claremont have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.7% in Mccurtain.
- In Mccurtain, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.5% compared to 6.7% in Claremont.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mccurtain at 17.2%, compared to 6.2% in Claremont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Claremont hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.5% compared to 10.3% in Mccurtain.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.