Demographics details for Claremont, CA vs Frisco, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Claremont, CA vs Frisco, TX.
| Data | Claremont | Frisco |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 36,001 | 219,587 |
| Median Age | 41.5 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $115,091 | $144,567 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 3% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Claremont vs Frisco
- The population in Frisco is higher at 219,587, compared to 36,001 in Claremont.
- Residents in Claremont have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 37.8 years in Frisco.
- Frisco has a higher median income of $144,567, compared to $115,091 in Claremont.
- In Frisco, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 42.0% in Claremont.
- Claremont has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 3% in Frisco.
- The unemployment rate in Claremont is higher at 5.4%, compared to 3.9% in Frisco.
Demographics
Demographics Claremont vs Frisco provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Claremont | Frisco |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 8 |
| White | 37 | 49 |
| Asian | 16 | 23 |
| Hispanic | 25 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Claremont vs Frisco
- In Frisco, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 6% in Claremont.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Frisco at 49% compared to 37% in Claremont.
- In Frisco, the Asian population stands at 23%, greater than 16% in Claremont.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Claremont at 25% compared to 12% in Frisco.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Claremont at 16% compared to 8% in Frisco.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Claremont and Frisco at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Claremont | Frisco |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.0% | 13.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 7.9% |
| Depression | 16.3% | 20.8% |
| Smoking | 8.2% | 9.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 24.5% | 27.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Claremont vs Frisco
- More residents in Claremont report poor mental health at 14.0% compared to 13.4% in Frisco.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Frisco at 20.8% versus 16.3% in Claremont.
- Frisco has a higher smoking rate at 9.6% compared to 8.2% in Claremont.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Frisco at 18.4% compared to 16.7% in Claremont.
- Frisco has higher obesity rates at 27.4% compared to 24.5% in Claremont.
- Disability percentages are higher in Claremont at 11.0% compared to 6.0% in Frisco.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Claremont | Frisco |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (403) | 0.6% (1,358) |
| High School Diploma | 6.7% (2,427) | 5.0% (11,084) |
| Less than High School | 6.2% (2,248) | 3.4% (7,431) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 39.5% (14,204) | 38.9% (85,346) |
Education Levels Comparison: Claremont vs Frisco
- A higher percentage of residents in Claremont have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.6% in Frisco.
- A higher percentage of residents in Claremont hold a high school diploma at 6.7% compared to 5.0% in Frisco.
- More residents in Claremont have less than a high school education at 6.2% compared to 3.4% in Frisco.
- A higher percentage of residents in Claremont hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.5% compared to 38.9% in Frisco.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.