Demographics details for Citrus heights, CA vs Ponca city, OK

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Citrus heights, CA vs Ponca city, OK.

Data Citrus heights Ponca city
Population 86,433 24,340
Median Age 38.1 years 37.0 years
Median Income $75,022 $51,367
Married Families 36.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 10% 18%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.4

Population Comparison: Citrus heights vs Ponca city

  • In Citrus heights, the population is higher at 86,433, compared to 24,340 in Ponca city.
  • Residents in Citrus heights have a higher median age of 38.1 years compared to 37.0 years in Ponca city.
  • Citrus heights has a higher median income of $75,022 compared to $51,367 in Ponca city.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Citrus heights at 36.0% compared to 34.0% in Ponca city.
  • The poverty level is higher in Ponca city at 18%, compared to 10% in Citrus heights.
  • The unemployment rate in Citrus heights is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.4% in Ponca city.

Demographics

Demographics Citrus heights vs Ponca city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Citrus heights Ponca city
Black 3 3
White 62 67
Asian 5 1
Hispanic 20 9
Two or More Races 9 12
American Indian 1 8

Demographics Comparison: Citrus heights vs Ponca city

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Citrus heights and Ponca city at 3%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Ponca city at 67% compared to 62% in Citrus heights.
  • The Asian population is larger in Citrus heights at 5% compared to 1% in Ponca city.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Citrus heights at 20% compared to 9% in Ponca city.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ponca city at 12%, compared to 9% in Citrus heights.
  • In Ponca city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 8%, compared to 1% in Citrus heights.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Citrus heights Ponca city
Mental Health Not Good 17.7% 20.0%
Physical Health Not Good 11.3% 13.6%
Depression 21.5% 27.0%
Smoking 14.1% 22.1%
Binge Drinking 17.3% 14.8%
Obesity 32.8% 40.0%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Citrus heights vs Ponca city

  • In Ponca city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 17.7% in Citrus heights.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Ponca city at 27.0% versus 21.5% in Citrus heights.
  • Ponca city has a higher smoking rate at 22.1% compared to 14.1% in Citrus heights.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Citrus heights at 17.3% compared to 14.8% in Ponca city.
  • Ponca city has higher obesity rates at 40.0% compared to 32.8% in Citrus heights.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ponca city at 19.0% compared to 15.0% in Citrus heights.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Citrus heights Ponca city
No Schooling 1.5% (1,266) 0.2% (51)
High School Diploma 15.8% (13,657) 17.0% (4,148)
Less than High School 12.5% (10,787) 12.0% (2,914)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.8% (13,696) 12.6% (3,069)

Education Levels Comparison: Citrus heights vs Ponca city

  • A higher percentage of residents in Citrus heights have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.2% in Ponca city.
  • In Ponca city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.0% compared to 15.8% in Citrus heights.
  • More residents in Citrus heights have less than a high school education at 12.5% compared to 12.0% in Ponca city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Citrus heights hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.8% compared to 12.6% in Ponca city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.