Demographics details for Citrus heights, CA vs Mount dora, FL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Citrus heights, CA vs Mount dora, FL.

Data Citrus heights Mount dora
Population 86,433 17,160
Median Age 38.1 years 48.6 years
Median Income $75,022 $65,774
Married Families 36.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 10% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.2

Population Comparison: Citrus heights vs Mount dora

  • In Citrus heights, the population is higher at 86,433, compared to 17,160 in Mount dora.
  • The median age in Mount dora is higher at 48.6 years, compared to 38.1 years in Citrus heights.
  • Citrus heights has a higher median income of $75,022 compared to $65,774 in Mount dora.
  • In Mount dora, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 36.0% in Citrus heights.
  • The poverty level is higher in Mount dora at 12%, compared to 10% in Citrus heights.
  • The unemployment rate in Citrus heights is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.2% in Mount dora.

Demographics

Demographics Citrus heights vs Mount dora provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Citrus heights Mount dora
Black 3 13
White 62 65
Asian 5 Data is updating
Hispanic 20 15
Two or More Races 9 7
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Citrus heights vs Mount dora

  • In Mount dora, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 3% in Citrus heights.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Mount dora at 65% compared to 62% in Citrus heights.
  • The Asian population is larger in Citrus heights at 5% compared to 0% in Mount dora.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Citrus heights at 20% compared to 15% in Mount dora.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Citrus heights at 9% compared to 7% in Mount dora.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Citrus heights at 1% compared to 0% in Mount dora.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Citrus heights Mount dora
Mental Health Not Good 17.7% 17.0%
Physical Health Not Good 11.3% 11.6%
Depression 21.5% 20.8%
Smoking 14.1% 20.4%
Binge Drinking 17.3% 15.0%
Obesity 32.8% 37.5%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Citrus heights vs Mount dora

  • More residents in Citrus heights report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 17.0% in Mount dora.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Citrus heights at 21.5% compared to 20.8% in Mount dora.
  • Mount dora has a higher smoking rate at 20.4% compared to 14.1% in Citrus heights.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Citrus heights at 17.3% compared to 15.0% in Mount dora.
  • Mount dora has higher obesity rates at 37.5% compared to 32.8% in Citrus heights.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mount dora at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Citrus heights.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Citrus heights Mount dora
No Schooling 1.5% (1,266) 0.3% (47)
High School Diploma 15.8% (13,657) 16.5% (2,834)
Less than High School 12.5% (10,787) 8.2% (1,409)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.8% (13,696) 25.6% (4,390)

Education Levels Comparison: Citrus heights vs Mount dora

  • A higher percentage of residents in Citrus heights have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.3% in Mount dora.
  • In Mount dora, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.5% compared to 15.8% in Citrus heights.
  • More residents in Citrus heights have less than a high school education at 12.5% compared to 8.2% in Mount dora.
  • In Mount dora, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.6% compared to 15.8% in Citrus heights.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.