Demographics details for Cincinnati, OH vs South jordan, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cincinnati, OH vs South jordan, UT.
Data | Cincinnati | South jordan |
---|---|---|
Population | 309,513 | 83,513 |
Median Age | 32.9 years | 34.4 years |
Median Income | $49,191 | $119,822 |
Married Families | 24.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 17% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.8 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Cincinnati vs South jordan
- In Cincinnati, the population is higher at 309,513, compared to 83,513 in South jordan.
- The median age in South jordan is higher at 34.4 years, compared to 32.9 years in Cincinnati.
- South jordan has a higher median income of $119,822, compared to $49,191 in Cincinnati.
- In South jordan, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 24.0% in Cincinnati.
- Cincinnati has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 5% in South jordan.
- The unemployment rate in Cincinnati is higher at 5.8%, compared to 3.7% in South jordan.
Demographics
Demographics Cincinnati vs South jordan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cincinnati | South jordan |
---|---|---|
Black | 40 | Data is updating |
White | 46 | 83 |
Asian | 3 | 4 |
Hispanic | 5 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Cincinnati vs South jordan
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cincinnati at 40% compared to 0% in South jordan.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in South jordan at 83% compared to 46% in Cincinnati.
- In South jordan, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 3% in Cincinnati.
- South jordan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 5% in Cincinnati.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cincinnati at 6% compared to 5% in South jordan.
- In South jordan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Cincinnati.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cincinnati | South jordan |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 16.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 9.0% |
Depression | 21.6% | 26.5% |
Smoking | 21.3% | 7.3% |
Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 16.9% |
Obesity | 39.8% | 28.6% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cincinnati vs South jordan
- More residents in Cincinnati report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 16.7% in South jordan.
- Higher depression rates are seen in South jordan at 26.5% versus 21.6% in Cincinnati.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cincinnati at 21.3% compared to 7.3% in South jordan.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cincinnati at 18.2% compared to 16.9% in South jordan.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cincinnati at 39.8% compared to 28.6% in South jordan.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cincinnati at 13.0% compared to 6.0% in South jordan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cincinnati | South jordan |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (2,632) | 0.2% (172) |
High School Diploma | 12.5% (38,643) | 8.4% (6,995) |
Less than High School | 9.6% (29,753) | 2.7% (2,236) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.4% (81,592) | 27.1% (22,648) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cincinnati vs South jordan
- A higher percentage of residents in Cincinnati have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.2% in South jordan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cincinnati hold a high school diploma at 12.5% compared to 8.4% in South jordan.
- More residents in Cincinnati have less than a high school education at 9.6% compared to 2.7% in South jordan.
- In South jordan, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 26.4% in Cincinnati.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.