Demographics details for Cicero, IL vs Science hill, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cicero, IL vs Science hill, KY.
| Data | Cicero | Science hill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 81,919 | 656 |
| Median Age | 33.4 years | 33.1 years |
| Median Income | $64,325 | $36,250 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.4 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Cicero vs Science hill
- In Cicero, the population is higher at 81,919, compared to 656 in Science hill.
- Residents in Cicero have a higher median age of 33.4 years compared to 33.1 years in Science hill.
- Cicero has a higher median income of $64,325 compared to $36,250 in Science hill.
- In Science hill, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 32.0% in Cicero.
- The poverty level is higher in Science hill at 18%, compared to 14% in Cicero.
- The unemployment rate in Cicero is higher at 6.4%, compared to 3.4% in Science hill.
Demographics
Demographics Cicero vs Science hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cicero | Science hill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | Data is updating |
| White | -10 | 95 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 90 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cicero vs Science hill
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cicero at 4% compared to 0% in Science hill.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Science hill at 95% compared to -10% in Cicero.
- The Asian population is larger in Cicero at 1% compared to 0% in Science hill.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cicero at 90% compared to 2% in Science hill.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cicero at 14% compared to 3% in Science hill.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Cicero at 1% compared to 0% in Science hill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cicero | Science hill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 21.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | 16.8% |
| Depression | 16.8% | 31.5% |
| Smoking | 16.5% | 26.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 14.1% |
| Obesity | 36.8% | 39.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cicero vs Science hill
- In Science hill, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.2% compared to 15.3% in Cicero.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Science hill at 31.5% versus 16.8% in Cicero.
- Science hill has a higher smoking rate at 26.0% compared to 16.5% in Cicero.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cicero at 16.2% compared to 14.1% in Science hill.
- Science hill has higher obesity rates at 39.6% compared to 36.8% in Cicero.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Science hill at 23.0% compared to 6.0% in Cicero.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cicero | Science hill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.2% (2,662) | 0.5% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 19.6% (16,037) | 12.8% (84) |
| Less than High School | 38.2% (31,314) | 19.8% (130) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.1% (5,829) | 9.5% (62) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cicero vs Science hill
- A higher percentage of residents in Cicero have no formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.5% in Science hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cicero hold a high school diploma at 19.6% compared to 12.8% in Science hill.
- More residents in Cicero have less than a high school education at 38.2% compared to 19.8% in Science hill.
- In Science hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.5% compared to 7.1% in Cicero.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.