Demographics details for Cicero, IL vs Mukilteo, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cicero, IL vs Mukilteo, WA.
| Data | Cicero | Mukilteo |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 81,919 | 21,096 |
| Median Age | 33.4 years | 43.6 years |
| Median Income | $64,325 | $123,036 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.4 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Cicero vs Mukilteo
- In Cicero, the population is higher at 81,919, compared to 21,096 in Mukilteo.
- The median age in Mukilteo is higher at 43.6 years, compared to 33.4 years in Cicero.
- Mukilteo has a higher median income of $123,036, compared to $64,325 in Cicero.
- In Mukilteo, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 32.0% in Cicero.
- Cicero has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 5% in Mukilteo.
- The unemployment rate in Cicero is higher at 6.4%, compared to 3.2% in Mukilteo.
Demographics
Demographics Cicero vs Mukilteo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cicero | Mukilteo |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 1 |
| White | -10 | 61 |
| Asian | 1 | 21 |
| Hispanic | 90 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 11 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cicero vs Mukilteo
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cicero at 4% compared to 1% in Mukilteo.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mukilteo at 61% compared to -10% in Cicero.
- In Mukilteo, the Asian population stands at 21%, greater than 1% in Cicero.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cicero at 90% compared to 6% in Mukilteo.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cicero at 14% compared to 11% in Mukilteo.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Cicero at 1% compared to 0% in Mukilteo.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cicero | Mukilteo |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 14.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | 8.9% |
| Depression | 16.8% | 26.5% |
| Smoking | 16.5% | 9.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 15.7% |
| Obesity | 36.8% | 29.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cicero vs Mukilteo
- More residents in Cicero report poor mental health at 15.3% compared to 14.6% in Mukilteo.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mukilteo at 26.5% versus 16.8% in Cicero.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cicero at 16.5% compared to 9.3% in Mukilteo.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cicero at 16.2% compared to 15.7% in Mukilteo.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cicero at 36.8% compared to 29.2% in Mukilteo.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mukilteo at 10.0% compared to 6.0% in Cicero.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cicero | Mukilteo |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.2% (2,662) | 0.1% (24) |
| High School Diploma | 19.6% (16,037) | 9.7% (2,042) |
| Less than High School | 38.2% (31,314) | 2.0% (414) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.1% (5,829) | 38.3% (8,089) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cicero vs Mukilteo
- A higher percentage of residents in Cicero have no formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.1% in Mukilteo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cicero hold a high school diploma at 19.6% compared to 9.7% in Mukilteo.
- More residents in Cicero have less than a high school education at 38.2% compared to 2.0% in Mukilteo.
- In Mukilteo, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.3% compared to 7.1% in Cicero.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.