Demographics details for Cicero, IL vs Moscow, ID
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cicero, IL vs Moscow, ID.
| Data | Cicero | Moscow |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 81,919 | 26,249 |
| Median Age | 33.4 years | 24.8 years |
| Median Income | $64,325 | $53,679 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.4 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Cicero vs Moscow
- In Cicero, the population is higher at 81,919, compared to 26,249 in Moscow.
- Residents in Cicero have a higher median age of 33.4 years compared to 24.8 years in Moscow.
- Cicero has a higher median income of $64,325 compared to $53,679 in Moscow.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cicero at 32.0% compared to 28.0% in Moscow.
- The poverty level is higher in Moscow at 15%, compared to 14% in Cicero.
- The unemployment rate in Cicero is higher at 6.4%, compared to 4.2% in Moscow.
Demographics
Demographics Cicero vs Moscow provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cicero | Moscow |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 2 |
| White | -10 | 83 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 90 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Cicero vs Moscow
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cicero at 4% compared to 2% in Moscow.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Moscow at 83% compared to -10% in Cicero.
- In Moscow, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Cicero.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cicero at 90% compared to 5% in Moscow.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cicero at 14% compared to 6% in Moscow.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cicero and Moscow at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cicero | Moscow |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 16.8% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 16.5% | 13.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 36.8% | 31.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cicero vs Moscow
- In Moscow, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 15.3% in Cicero.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Moscow at 24.5% versus 16.8% in Cicero.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cicero at 16.5% compared to 13.6% in Moscow.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Moscow at 17.1% compared to 16.2% in Cicero.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cicero at 36.8% compared to 31.2% in Moscow.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Moscow at 10.0% compared to 6.0% in Cicero.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cicero | Moscow |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.2% (2,662) | 0.3% (80) |
| High School Diploma | 19.6% (16,037) | 5.7% (1,492) |
| Less than High School | 38.2% (31,314) | 2.0% (515) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.1% (5,829) | 25.8% (6,776) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cicero vs Moscow
- A higher percentage of residents in Cicero have no formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.3% in Moscow.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cicero hold a high school diploma at 19.6% compared to 5.7% in Moscow.
- More residents in Cicero have less than a high school education at 38.2% compared to 2.0% in Moscow.
- In Moscow, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.8% compared to 7.1% in Cicero.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.