Demographics details for Cicero, IL vs Methuen, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cicero, IL vs Methuen, MA.
Data | Cicero | Methuen |
---|---|---|
Population | 81,919 | 53,241 |
Median Age | 33.4 years | 40.6 years |
Median Income | $64,325 | $93,681 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.4 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Cicero vs Methuen
- In Cicero, the population is higher at 81,919, compared to 53,241 in Methuen.
- The median age in Methuen is higher at 40.6 years, compared to 33.4 years in Cicero.
- Methuen has a higher median income of $93,681, compared to $64,325 in Cicero.
- In Methuen, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 32.0% in Cicero.
- Cicero has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 8% in Methuen.
- The unemployment rate in Cicero is higher at 6.4%, compared to 4.6% in Methuen.
Demographics
Demographics Cicero vs Methuen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cicero | Methuen |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 5 |
White | -10 | 51 |
Asian | 1 | 4 |
Hispanic | 90 | 30 |
Two or More Races | 14 | 10 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cicero vs Methuen
- In Methuen, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 4% in Cicero.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Methuen at 51% compared to -10% in Cicero.
- In Methuen, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Cicero.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cicero at 90% compared to 30% in Methuen.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cicero at 14% compared to 10% in Methuen.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Cicero at 1% compared to 0% in Methuen.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cicero | Methuen |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 17.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | 9.8% |
Depression | 16.8% | 23.4% |
Smoking | 16.5% | 14.1% |
Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 17.7% |
Obesity | 36.8% | 30.4% |
Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cicero vs Methuen
- In Methuen, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 15.3% in Cicero.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Methuen at 23.4% versus 16.8% in Cicero.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cicero at 16.5% compared to 14.1% in Methuen.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Methuen at 17.7% compared to 16.2% in Cicero.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cicero at 36.8% compared to 30.4% in Methuen.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Methuen at 11.0% compared to 6.0% in Cicero.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cicero | Methuen |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.2% (2,662) | 1.4% (741) |
High School Diploma | 19.6% (16,037) | 17.4% (9,266) |
Less than High School | 38.2% (31,314) | 13.9% (7,384) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.1% (5,829) | 21.3% (11,336) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cicero vs Methuen
- A higher percentage of residents in Cicero have no formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 1.4% in Methuen.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cicero hold a high school diploma at 19.6% compared to 17.4% in Methuen.
- More residents in Cicero have less than a high school education at 38.2% compared to 13.9% in Methuen.
- In Methuen, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 7.1% in Cicero.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.