Demographics details for Cicero, IL vs Fort payne, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cicero, IL vs Fort payne, AL.
| Data | Cicero | Fort payne |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 81,919 | 14,879 |
| Median Age | 33.4 years | 39.7 years |
| Median Income | $64,325 | $44,549 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.4 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Cicero vs Fort payne
- In Cicero, the population is higher at 81,919, compared to 14,879 in Fort payne.
- The median age in Fort payne is higher at 39.7 years, compared to 33.4 years in Cicero.
- Cicero has a higher median income of $64,325 compared to $44,549 in Fort payne.
- In Fort payne, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 32.0% in Cicero.
- Cicero has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 11% in Fort payne.
- The unemployment rate in Cicero is higher at 6.4%, compared to 2.5% in Fort payne.
Demographics
Demographics Cicero vs Fort payne provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cicero | Fort payne |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 2 |
| White | -10 | 72 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 90 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Cicero vs Fort payne
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cicero at 4% compared to 2% in Fort payne.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort payne at 72% compared to -10% in Cicero.
- The Asian population is larger in Cicero at 1% compared to 0% in Fort payne.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cicero at 90% compared to 20% in Fort payne.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cicero at 14% compared to 4% in Fort payne.
- In Fort payne, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Cicero.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cicero | Fort payne |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 21.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | 16.1% |
| Depression | 16.8% | 26.0% |
| Smoking | 16.5% | 23.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 14.3% |
| Obesity | 36.8% | 41.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cicero vs Fort payne
- In Fort payne, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.2% compared to 15.3% in Cicero.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort payne at 26.0% versus 16.8% in Cicero.
- Fort payne has a higher smoking rate at 23.3% compared to 16.5% in Cicero.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cicero at 16.2% compared to 14.3% in Fort payne.
- Fort payne has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 36.8% in Cicero.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort payne at 13.0% compared to 6.0% in Cicero.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cicero | Fort payne |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.2% (2,662) | 2.7% (402) |
| High School Diploma | 19.6% (16,037) | 14.2% (2,110) |
| Less than High School | 38.2% (31,314) | 27.9% (4,155) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.1% (5,829) | 11.9% (1,767) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cicero vs Fort payne
- A higher percentage of residents in Cicero have no formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 2.7% in Fort payne.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cicero hold a high school diploma at 19.6% compared to 14.2% in Fort payne.
- More residents in Cicero have less than a high school education at 38.2% compared to 27.9% in Fort payne.
- In Fort payne, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.9% compared to 7.1% in Cicero.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.