Demographics details for Cicero, IL vs Awendaw, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cicero, IL vs Awendaw, SC.
| Data | Cicero | Awendaw |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 81,919 | 1,429 |
| Median Age | 33.4 years | 57.8 years |
| Median Income | $64,325 | $63,533 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 56.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.4 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Cicero vs Awendaw
- In Cicero, the population is higher at 81,919, compared to 1,429 in Awendaw.
- The median age in Awendaw is higher at 57.8 years, compared to 33.4 years in Cicero.
- Cicero has a higher median income of $64,325 compared to $63,533 in Awendaw.
- In Awendaw, the percentage of married families is higher at 56.0%, compared to 32.0% in Cicero.
- Cicero has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 5% in Awendaw.
- The unemployment rate in Cicero is higher at 6.4%, compared to 3.2% in Awendaw.
Demographics
Demographics Cicero vs Awendaw provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cicero | Awendaw |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 58 |
| White | -10 | 42 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 90 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 14 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cicero vs Awendaw
- In Awendaw, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 58% compared to 4% in Cicero.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Awendaw at 42% compared to -10% in Cicero.
- The Asian population is larger in Cicero at 1% compared to 0% in Awendaw.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cicero at 90% compared to 0% in Awendaw.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cicero at 14% compared to 0% in Awendaw.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Cicero at 1% compared to 0% in Awendaw.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cicero | Awendaw |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | 10.7% |
| Depression | 16.8% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 16.5% | 16.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 21.5% |
| Obesity | 36.8% | 35.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cicero vs Awendaw
- In Awendaw, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 15.3% in Cicero.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Awendaw at 17.8% versus 16.8% in Cicero.
- Awendaw has a higher smoking rate at 16.6% compared to 16.5% in Cicero.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Awendaw at 21.5% compared to 16.2% in Cicero.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cicero at 36.8% compared to 35.8% in Awendaw.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Awendaw at 21.0% compared to 6.0% in Cicero.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cicero | Awendaw |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.2% (2,662) | 1.0% (14) |
| High School Diploma | 19.6% (16,037) | 24.6% (352) |
| Less than High School | 38.2% (31,314) | 14.8% (212) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.1% (5,829) | 30.4% (435) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cicero vs Awendaw
- A higher percentage of residents in Cicero have no formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 1.0% in Awendaw.
- In Awendaw, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.6% compared to 19.6% in Cicero.
- More residents in Cicero have less than a high school education at 38.2% compared to 14.8% in Awendaw.
- In Awendaw, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.4% compared to 7.1% in Cicero.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.