Demographics details for Churdan, IA vs Woodbridge, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Churdan, IA vs Woodbridge, VA.
| Data | Churdan | Woodbridge |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 363 | 42,619 |
| Median Age | 28.8 years | 34.2 years |
| Median Income | $58,125 | $93,347 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Churdan vs Woodbridge
- The population in Woodbridge is higher at 42,619, compared to 363 in Churdan.
- The median age in Woodbridge is higher at 34.2 years, compared to 28.8 years in Churdan.
- Woodbridge has a higher median income of $93,347, compared to $58,125 in Churdan.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Churdan at 49.0% compared to 35.0% in Woodbridge.
- Churdan has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Woodbridge.
- Woodbridge has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 3.0% in Churdan.
Demographics
Demographics Churdan vs Woodbridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Churdan | Woodbridge |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 26 |
| White | 87 | 10 |
| Asian | 3 | 9 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 41 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 13 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Churdan vs Woodbridge
- In Woodbridge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 26% compared to 1% in Churdan.
- Churdan has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 10% in Woodbridge.
- In Woodbridge, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 3% in Churdan.
- Woodbridge has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 41%, compared to 2% in Churdan.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woodbridge at 13%, compared to 5% in Churdan.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Churdan at 2% compared to 1% in Woodbridge.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Churdan | Woodbridge |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 13.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 8.3% |
| Depression | 19.7% | 17.4% |
| Smoking | 18.3% | 10.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.1% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 36.4% | 34.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 25.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Churdan vs Woodbridge
- More residents in Churdan report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 13.3% in Woodbridge.
- Depression is more prevalent in Churdan at 19.7% compared to 17.4% in Woodbridge.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Churdan at 18.3% compared to 10.7% in Woodbridge.
- Binge drinking is more common in Churdan at 21.1% compared to 16.3% in Woodbridge.
- Obesity rates are higher in Churdan at 36.4% compared to 34.0% in Woodbridge.
- Disability percentages are higher in Churdan at 25.0% compared to 9.0% in Woodbridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Churdan | Woodbridge |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 3.4% (1,450) |
| High School Diploma | 30.6% (111) | 15.8% (6,727) |
| Less than High School | 12.7% (46) | 17.5% (7,473) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.6% (42) | 20.2% (8,628) |
Education Levels Comparison: Churdan vs Woodbridge
- In Woodbridge, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.4% compared to 0.0% in Churdan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Churdan hold a high school diploma at 30.6% compared to 15.8% in Woodbridge.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Woodbridge at 17.5%, compared to 12.7% in Churdan.
- In Woodbridge, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.2% compared to 11.6% in Churdan.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.