Demographics details for Churdan, IA vs Hagerstown, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Churdan, IA vs Hagerstown, MD.
Data | Churdan | Hagerstown |
---|---|---|
Population | 363 | 43,701 |
Median Age | 28.8 years | 35.9 years |
Median Income | $58,125 | $48,481 |
Married Families | 49.0% | 29.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Churdan vs Hagerstown
- The population in Hagerstown is higher at 43,701, compared to 363 in Churdan.
- The median age in Hagerstown is higher at 35.9 years, compared to 28.8 years in Churdan.
- Churdan has a higher median income of $58,125 compared to $48,481 in Hagerstown.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Churdan at 49.0% compared to 29.0% in Hagerstown.
- The poverty level is identical in both Churdan and Hagerstown at 10%.
- Hagerstown has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.0% in Churdan.
Demographics
Demographics Churdan vs Hagerstown provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Churdan | Hagerstown |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 21 |
White | 87 | 56 |
Asian | 3 | 2 |
Hispanic | 2 | 10 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 11 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Churdan vs Hagerstown
- In Hagerstown, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 1% in Churdan.
- Churdan has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 56% in Hagerstown.
- The Asian population is larger in Churdan at 3% compared to 2% in Hagerstown.
- Hagerstown has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 2% in Churdan.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hagerstown at 11%, compared to 5% in Churdan.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Churdan at 2% compared to 0% in Hagerstown.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Churdan | Hagerstown |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 19.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 13.5% |
Depression | 19.7% | 25.7% |
Smoking | 18.3% | 21.9% |
Binge Drinking | 21.1% | 14.1% |
Obesity | 36.4% | 42.7% |
Disability Percentage | 25.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Churdan vs Hagerstown
- In Hagerstown, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 16.2% in Churdan.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hagerstown at 25.7% versus 19.7% in Churdan.
- Hagerstown has a higher smoking rate at 21.9% compared to 18.3% in Churdan.
- Binge drinking is more common in Churdan at 21.1% compared to 14.1% in Hagerstown.
- Hagerstown has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 36.4% in Churdan.
- Disability percentages are higher in Churdan at 25.0% compared to 20.0% in Hagerstown.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Churdan | Hagerstown |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.1% (496) |
High School Diploma | 30.6% (111) | 20.5% (8,968) |
Less than High School | 12.7% (46) | 17.1% (7,464) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.6% (42) | 13.1% (5,726) |
Education Levels Comparison: Churdan vs Hagerstown
- In Hagerstown, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Churdan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Churdan hold a high school diploma at 30.6% compared to 20.5% in Hagerstown.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hagerstown at 17.1%, compared to 12.7% in Churdan.
- In Hagerstown, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.1% compared to 11.6% in Churdan.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.