Demographics details for Churdan, IA vs Chanhassen, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Churdan, IA vs Chanhassen, MN.
| Data | Churdan | Chanhassen |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 363 | 26,224 |
| Median Age | 28.8 years | 40.6 years |
| Median Income | $58,125 | $131,633 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Churdan vs Chanhassen
- The population in Chanhassen is higher at 26,224, compared to 363 in Churdan.
- The median age in Chanhassen is higher at 40.6 years, compared to 28.8 years in Churdan.
- Chanhassen has a higher median income of $131,633, compared to $58,125 in Churdan.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Churdan at 49.0% compared to 47.0% in Chanhassen.
- Churdan has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 4% in Chanhassen.
- Chanhassen has a higher unemployment rate at 3.4% compared to 3.0% in Churdan.
Demographics
Demographics Churdan vs Chanhassen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Churdan | Chanhassen |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 87 | 84 |
| Asian | 3 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Churdan vs Chanhassen
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Churdan and Chanhassen at 1%.
- Churdan has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 84% in Chanhassen.
- In Chanhassen, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 3% in Churdan.
- Chanhassen has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 2% in Churdan.
- Both Churdan and Chanhassen have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Churdan at 2% compared to 0% in Chanhassen.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Churdan | Chanhassen |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 11.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 6.4% |
| Depression | 19.7% | 19.8% |
| Smoking | 18.3% | 10.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.1% | 20.9% |
| Obesity | 36.4% | 29.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 25.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Churdan vs Chanhassen
- More residents in Churdan report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 11.8% in Chanhassen.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chanhassen at 19.8% versus 19.7% in Churdan.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Churdan at 18.3% compared to 10.0% in Chanhassen.
- Binge drinking is more common in Churdan at 21.1% compared to 20.9% in Chanhassen.
- Obesity rates are higher in Churdan at 36.4% compared to 29.7% in Chanhassen.
- Disability percentages are higher in Churdan at 25.0% compared to 5.0% in Chanhassen.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Churdan | Chanhassen |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.1% (31) |
| High School Diploma | 30.6% (111) | 5.7% (1,502) |
| Less than High School | 12.7% (46) | 1.7% (452) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.6% (42) | 42.7% (11,186) |
Education Levels Comparison: Churdan vs Chanhassen
- In Chanhassen, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Churdan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Churdan hold a high school diploma at 30.6% compared to 5.7% in Chanhassen.
- More residents in Churdan have less than a high school education at 12.7% compared to 1.7% in Chanhassen.
- In Chanhassen, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.7% compared to 11.6% in Churdan.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.