Demographics details for Churdan, IA vs Carmel, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Churdan, IA vs Carmel, IN.
| Data | Churdan | Carmel |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 363 | 101,964 |
| Median Age | 28.8 years | 40.6 years |
| Median Income | $58,125 | $132,859 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 49.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Churdan vs Carmel
- The population in Carmel is higher at 101,964, compared to 363 in Churdan.
- The median age in Carmel is higher at 40.6 years, compared to 28.8 years in Churdan.
- Carmel has a higher median income of $132,859, compared to $58,125 in Churdan.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Churdan and Carmel at 49.0%.
- Churdan has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 4% in Carmel.
- Carmel has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.0% in Churdan.
Demographics
Demographics Churdan vs Carmel provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Churdan | Carmel |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 3 |
| White | 87 | 77 |
| Asian | 3 | 11 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Churdan vs Carmel
- In Carmel, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Churdan.
- Churdan has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 77% in Carmel.
- In Carmel, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 3% in Churdan.
- Carmel has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 2% in Churdan.
- Both Churdan and Carmel have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Churdan at 2% compared to 0% in Carmel.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Churdan | Carmel |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 12.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 6.9% |
| Depression | 19.7% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 18.3% | 9.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.1% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 36.4% | 27.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 25.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Churdan vs Carmel
- More residents in Churdan report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 12.2% in Carmel.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Carmel at 21.8% versus 19.7% in Churdan.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Churdan at 18.3% compared to 9.0% in Carmel.
- Binge drinking is more common in Churdan at 21.1% compared to 16.7% in Carmel.
- Obesity rates are higher in Churdan at 36.4% compared to 27.0% in Carmel.
- Disability percentages are higher in Churdan at 25.0% compared to 6.0% in Carmel.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Churdan | Carmel |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.3% (323) |
| High School Diploma | 30.6% (111) | 4.8% (4,920) |
| Less than High School | 12.7% (46) | 2.3% (2,394) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.6% (42) | 48.5% (49,477) |
Education Levels Comparison: Churdan vs Carmel
- In Carmel, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Churdan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Churdan hold a high school diploma at 30.6% compared to 4.8% in Carmel.
- More residents in Churdan have less than a high school education at 12.7% compared to 2.3% in Carmel.
- In Carmel, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 48.5% compared to 11.6% in Churdan.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.