Demographics details for Churdan, IA vs Cambridge, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Churdan, IA vs Cambridge, OH.
| Data | Churdan | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 363 | 9,985 |
| Median Age | 28.8 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $58,125 | $39,589 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Churdan vs Cambridge
- The population in Cambridge is higher at 9,985, compared to 363 in Churdan.
- The median age in Cambridge is higher at 35.1 years, compared to 28.8 years in Churdan.
- Churdan has a higher median income of $58,125 compared to $39,589 in Cambridge.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Churdan at 49.0% compared to 28.0% in Cambridge.
- The poverty level is higher in Cambridge at 16%, compared to 10% in Churdan.
- Cambridge has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.0% in Churdan.
Demographics
Demographics Churdan vs Cambridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Churdan | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 6 |
| White | 87 | 88 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Churdan vs Cambridge
- In Cambridge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 1% in Churdan.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cambridge at 88% compared to 87% in Churdan.
- The Asian population is larger in Churdan at 3% compared to 0% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Churdan and Cambridge at 2%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Churdan at 5% compared to 4% in Cambridge.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Churdan at 2% compared to 0% in Cambridge.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Churdan | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 20.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 15.1% |
| Depression | 19.7% | 25.9% |
| Smoking | 18.3% | 26.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.1% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 36.4% | 46.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 25.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Churdan vs Cambridge
- In Cambridge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 16.2% in Churdan.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cambridge at 25.9% versus 19.7% in Churdan.
- Cambridge has a higher smoking rate at 26.2% compared to 18.3% in Churdan.
- Binge drinking is more common in Churdan at 21.1% compared to 16.9% in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has higher obesity rates at 46.4% compared to 36.4% in Churdan.
- Disability percentages are higher in Churdan at 25.0% compared to 19.0% in Cambridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Churdan | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (73) |
| High School Diploma | 30.6% (111) | 25.1% (2,502) |
| Less than High School | 12.7% (46) | 17.3% (1,732) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.6% (42) | 8.8% (875) |
Education Levels Comparison: Churdan vs Cambridge
- In Cambridge, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Churdan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Churdan hold a high school diploma at 30.6% compared to 25.1% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cambridge at 17.3%, compared to 12.7% in Churdan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Churdan hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.6% compared to 8.8% in Cambridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.