Demographics details for Churchville, VA vs Coleman, OK

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Churchville, VA vs Coleman, OK.

Data Churchville Coleman
Population 61 297
Median Age 59.7 years 39.7 years
Median Income $81,220 $45,938
Married Families 59.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 12%
Unemployment Rate Data is updating 3.5

Population Comparison: Churchville vs Coleman

  • The population in Coleman is higher at 297, compared to 61 in Churchville.
  • Residents in Churchville have a higher median age of 59.7 years compared to 39.7 years in Coleman.
  • Churchville has a higher median income of $81,220 compared to $45,938 in Coleman.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Churchville at 59.0% compared to 35.0% in Coleman.
  • The poverty level is higher in Coleman at 12%, compared to 0% in Churchville.
  • Coleman has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 0.0% in Churchville.

Demographics

Demographics Churchville vs Coleman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Churchville Coleman
Black Data is updating 2
White 100 77
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating 1
Two or More Races Data is updating 9
American Indian Data is updating 11

Demographics Comparison: Churchville vs Coleman

  • In Coleman, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Churchville.
  • Churchville has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 77% in Coleman.
  • Both Churchville and Coleman have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Coleman has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 1%, compared to 0% in Churchville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Coleman at 9%, compared to 0% in Churchville.
  • In Coleman, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 11%, compared to 0% in Churchville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Churchville Coleman
Mental Health Not Good 17.2% 19.9%
Physical Health Not Good 10.3% 13.9%
Depression 24.9% 26.9%
Smoking 16.6% 22.9%
Binge Drinking 18.9% 14.8%
Obesity 34.4% 40.8%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 29.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Churchville vs Coleman

  • In Coleman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 17.2% in Churchville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Coleman at 26.9% versus 24.9% in Churchville.
  • Coleman has a higher smoking rate at 22.9% compared to 16.6% in Churchville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Churchville at 18.9% compared to 14.8% in Coleman.
  • Coleman has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 34.4% in Churchville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Coleman at 29.0% compared to 0.0% in Churchville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Churchville Coleman
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 28.6% (85)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 4.0% (12)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 50.8% (31) 11.1% (33)

Education Levels Comparison: Churchville vs Coleman

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Churchville and Coleman at 0.0%.
  • In Coleman, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.6% compared to 0.0% in Churchville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Coleman at 4.0%, compared to 0.0% in Churchville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Churchville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 50.8% compared to 11.1% in Coleman.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.