Demographics details for Chula vista, CA vs Thornton, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chula vista, CA vs Thornton, CO.
| Data | Chula vista | Thornton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 279,170 | 143,282 |
| Median Age | 36.1 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $101,984 | $95,064 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Chula vista vs Thornton
- In Chula vista, the population is higher at 279,170, compared to 143,282 in Thornton.
- Residents in Chula vista have a higher median age of 36.1 years compared to 33.7 years in Thornton.
- Chula vista has a higher median income of $101,984 compared to $95,064 in Thornton.
- In Thornton, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 39.0% in Chula vista.
- Chula vista has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Thornton.
- The unemployment rate in Chula vista is higher at 4.8%, compared to 4.2% in Thornton.
Demographics
Demographics Chula vista vs Thornton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chula vista | Thornton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 2 |
| White | -4 | 39 |
| Asian | 15 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 60 | 37 |
| Two or More Races | 23 | 15 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Chula vista vs Thornton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chula vista at 5% compared to 2% in Thornton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Thornton at 39% compared to -4% in Chula vista.
- The Asian population is larger in Chula vista at 15% compared to 6% in Thornton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chula vista at 60% compared to 37% in Thornton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chula vista at 23% compared to 15% in Thornton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Chula vista and Thornton at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chula vista | Thornton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 15.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 15.8% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 10.5% | 15.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 21.0% |
| Obesity | 24.9% | 30.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chula vista vs Thornton
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Chula vista and Thornton at 15.1%.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Thornton at 22.0% versus 15.8% in Chula vista.
- Thornton has a higher smoking rate at 15.1% compared to 10.5% in Chula vista.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Thornton at 21.0% compared to 17.4% in Chula vista.
- Thornton has higher obesity rates at 30.1% compared to 24.9% in Chula vista.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Thornton at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Chula vista.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chula vista | Thornton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (4,667) | 1.7% (2,448) |
| High School Diploma | 11.7% (32,545) | 13.2% (18,983) |
| Less than High School | 18.1% (50,584) | 14.7% (20,999) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.4% (56,958) | 19.3% (27,712) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chula vista vs Thornton
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Chula vista and Thornton at 1.7%.
- In Thornton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.2% compared to 11.7% in Chula vista.
- More residents in Chula vista have less than a high school education at 18.1% compared to 14.7% in Thornton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chula vista hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.4% compared to 19.3% in Thornton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.