Demographics details for Chula vista, CA vs Sitka, AK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chula vista, CA vs Sitka, AK.
| Data | Chula vista | Sitka |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 279,170 | 8,382 |
| Median Age | 36.1 years | 39.5 years |
| Median Income | $101,984 | $95,261 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Chula vista vs Sitka
- In Chula vista, the population is higher at 279,170, compared to 8,382 in Sitka.
- The median age in Sitka is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 36.1 years in Chula vista.
- Chula vista has a higher median income of $101,984 compared to $95,261 in Sitka.
- In Sitka, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 39.0% in Chula vista.
- Chula vista has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Sitka.
- The unemployment rate in Chula vista is higher at 4.8%, compared to 3.3% in Sitka.
Demographics
Demographics Chula vista vs Sitka provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chula vista | Sitka |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 1 |
| White | -4 | 57 |
| Asian | 15 | 8 |
| Hispanic | 60 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 23 | 18 |
| American Indian | 1 | 9 |
Demographics Comparison: Chula vista vs Sitka
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chula vista at 5% compared to 1% in Sitka.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sitka at 57% compared to -4% in Chula vista.
- The Asian population is larger in Chula vista at 15% compared to 8% in Sitka.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chula vista at 60% compared to 7% in Sitka.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chula vista at 23% compared to 18% in Sitka.
- In Sitka, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 9%, compared to 1% in Chula vista.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chula vista | Sitka |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 14.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 15.8% | 18.7% |
| Smoking | 10.5% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 19.3% |
| Obesity | 24.9% | 31.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chula vista vs Sitka
- More residents in Chula vista report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 14.6% in Sitka.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sitka at 18.7% versus 15.8% in Chula vista.
- Sitka has a higher smoking rate at 16.4% compared to 10.5% in Chula vista.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sitka at 19.3% compared to 17.4% in Chula vista.
- Sitka has higher obesity rates at 31.7% compared to 24.9% in Chula vista.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sitka at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Chula vista.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chula vista | Sitka |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (4,667) | 0.4% (33) |
| High School Diploma | 11.7% (32,545) | 16.7% (1,396) |
| Less than High School | 18.1% (50,584) | 5.8% (486) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.4% (56,958) | 24.8% (2,076) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chula vista vs Sitka
- A higher percentage of residents in Chula vista have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.4% in Sitka.
- In Sitka, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.7% compared to 11.7% in Chula vista.
- More residents in Chula vista have less than a high school education at 18.1% compared to 5.8% in Sitka.
- In Sitka, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.8% compared to 20.4% in Chula vista.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.