Demographics details for Chula vista, CA vs Richton, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chula vista, CA vs Richton, MS.
Data | Chula vista | Richton |
---|---|---|
Population | 279,170 | 902 |
Median Age | 36.1 years | 42.3 years |
Median Income | $101,984 | $33,621 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 16% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Chula vista vs Richton
- In Chula vista, the population is higher at 279,170, compared to 902 in Richton.
- The median age in Richton is higher at 42.3 years, compared to 36.1 years in Chula vista.
- Chula vista has a higher median income of $101,984 compared to $33,621 in Richton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chula vista at 39.0% compared to 35.0% in Richton.
- The poverty level is higher in Richton at 16%, compared to 12% in Chula vista.
- The unemployment rate in Chula vista is higher at 4.8%, compared to 3.5% in Richton.
Demographics
Demographics Chula vista vs Richton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Chula vista | Richton |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 32 |
White | -4 | 68 |
Asian | 15 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 60 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 23 | Data is updating |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chula vista vs Richton
- In Richton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 32% compared to 5% in Chula vista.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Richton at 68% compared to -4% in Chula vista.
- The Asian population is larger in Chula vista at 15% compared to 0% in Richton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chula vista at 60% compared to 0% in Richton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chula vista at 23% compared to 0% in Richton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chula vista at 1% compared to 0% in Richton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Chula vista | Richton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 19.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 14.8% |
Depression | 15.8% | 24.4% |
Smoking | 10.5% | 24.2% |
Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 13.2% |
Obesity | 24.9% | 42.8% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chula vista vs Richton
- In Richton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 15.1% in Chula vista.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Richton at 24.4% versus 15.8% in Chula vista.
- Richton has a higher smoking rate at 24.2% compared to 10.5% in Chula vista.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chula vista at 17.4% compared to 13.2% in Richton.
- Richton has higher obesity rates at 42.8% compared to 24.9% in Chula vista.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Richton at 24.0% compared to 9.0% in Chula vista.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Chula vista | Richton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.7% (4,667) | 4.2% (38) |
High School Diploma | 11.7% (32,545) | 26.9% (243) |
Less than High School | 18.1% (50,584) | 19.7% (178) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.4% (56,958) | 15.2% (137) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chula vista vs Richton
- In Richton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.2% compared to 1.7% in Chula vista.
- In Richton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.9% compared to 11.7% in Chula vista.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Richton at 19.7%, compared to 18.1% in Chula vista.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chula vista hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.4% compared to 15.2% in Richton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.