Demographics details for Chula vista, CA vs Dacula, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chula vista, CA vs Dacula, GA.
| Data | Chula vista | Dacula |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 279,170 | 7,460 |
| Median Age | 36.1 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $101,984 | $81,322 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Chula vista vs Dacula
- In Chula vista, the population is higher at 279,170, compared to 7,460 in Dacula.
- Residents in Chula vista have a higher median age of 36.1 years compared to 35.0 years in Dacula.
- Chula vista has a higher median income of $101,984 compared to $81,322 in Dacula.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Chula vista and Dacula at 39.0%.
- Chula vista has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Dacula.
- The unemployment rate in Chula vista is higher at 4.8%, compared to 3.2% in Dacula.
Demographics
Demographics Chula vista vs Dacula provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chula vista | Dacula |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 23 |
| White | -4 | 41 |
| Asian | 15 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 60 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 23 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Chula vista vs Dacula
- In Dacula, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 5% in Chula vista.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Dacula at 41% compared to -4% in Chula vista.
- The Asian population is larger in Chula vista at 15% compared to 7% in Dacula.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chula vista at 60% compared to 19% in Dacula.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chula vista at 23% compared to 9% in Dacula.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Chula vista and Dacula at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chula vista | Dacula |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 14.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 9.5% |
| Depression | 15.8% | 19.1% |
| Smoking | 10.5% | 12.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 24.9% | 29.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chula vista vs Dacula
- More residents in Chula vista report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 14.4% in Dacula.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Dacula at 19.1% versus 15.8% in Chula vista.
- Dacula has a higher smoking rate at 12.9% compared to 10.5% in Chula vista.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chula vista at 17.4% compared to 16.5% in Dacula.
- Dacula has higher obesity rates at 29.7% compared to 24.9% in Chula vista.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Dacula at 16.0% compared to 9.0% in Chula vista.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chula vista | Dacula |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (4,667) | 4.8% (355) |
| High School Diploma | 11.7% (32,545) | 8.0% (599) |
| Less than High School | 18.1% (50,584) | 17.0% (1,267) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.4% (56,958) | 13.2% (988) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chula vista vs Dacula
- In Dacula, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.8% compared to 1.7% in Chula vista.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chula vista hold a high school diploma at 11.7% compared to 8.0% in Dacula.
- More residents in Chula vista have less than a high school education at 18.1% compared to 17.0% in Dacula.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chula vista hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.4% compared to 13.2% in Dacula.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.