Demographics details for Christiansburg, VA vs Bellingham, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Christiansburg, VA vs Bellingham, WA.

Data Christiansburg Bellingham
Population 22,562 93,896
Median Age 39.1 years 33.7 years
Median Income $71,468 $64,026
Married Families 45.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 9% 11%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 4.5

Population Comparison: Christiansburg vs Bellingham

  • The population in Bellingham is higher at 93,896, compared to 22,562 in Christiansburg.
  • Residents in Christiansburg have a higher median age of 39.1 years compared to 33.7 years in Bellingham.
  • Christiansburg has a higher median income of $71,468 compared to $64,026 in Bellingham.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Christiansburg at 45.0% compared to 32.0% in Bellingham.
  • The poverty level is higher in Bellingham at 11%, compared to 9% in Christiansburg.
  • Bellingham has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Christiansburg.

Demographics

Demographics Christiansburg vs Bellingham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Christiansburg Bellingham
Black 5 1
White 84 74
Asian 4 6
Hispanic 3 10
Two or More Races 4 8
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Christiansburg vs Bellingham

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Christiansburg at 5% compared to 1% in Bellingham.
  • Christiansburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 74% in Bellingham.
  • In Bellingham, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 4% in Christiansburg.
  • Bellingham has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 3% in Christiansburg.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bellingham at 8%, compared to 4% in Christiansburg.
  • In Bellingham, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Christiansburg.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Christiansburg Bellingham
Mental Health Not Good 16.1% 17.6%
Physical Health Not Good 9.9% 10.9%
Depression 25.8% 30.0%
Smoking 14.4% 14.1%
Binge Drinking 19.2% 17.3%
Obesity 30.3% 25.6%
Disability Percentage 17.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Christiansburg vs Bellingham

  • In Bellingham, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 16.1% in Christiansburg.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Bellingham at 30.0% versus 25.8% in Christiansburg.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Christiansburg at 14.4% compared to 14.1% in Bellingham.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Christiansburg at 19.2% compared to 17.3% in Bellingham.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Christiansburg at 30.3% compared to 25.6% in Bellingham.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Christiansburg at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Bellingham.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Christiansburg Bellingham
No Schooling 0.3% (66) 0.5% (454)
High School Diploma 14.0% (3,152) 8.8% (8,220)
Less than High School 8.1% (1,827) 6.2% (5,781)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 31.9% (7,193) 28.9% (27,095)

Education Levels Comparison: Christiansburg vs Bellingham

  • In Bellingham, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Christiansburg.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Christiansburg hold a high school diploma at 14.0% compared to 8.8% in Bellingham.
  • More residents in Christiansburg have less than a high school education at 8.1% compared to 6.2% in Bellingham.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Christiansburg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.9% compared to 28.9% in Bellingham.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.